17 share
moderate interest
PREVIEW of United States Supreme Court Cases offers expert analysis of the issues, background, and significance of every case slated for argument in the Supreme Court.
As part of our comprehensive coverage, the following briefs are now available online:
Was Mr. Yates deprived of fair notice that destruction of fish would fall within the purview of 18 U.S.C. § 1519, where the term "tangible object" is ambiguous and undefined in the statute, and unlike the nouns accompanying "tangible object" in section 1519, possesses no record-keeping, documentary, or informational content or purpose?
- Brief for Cato Institute in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Cause of Action, Southeastern Legal Foundation and Texas Public Policy Foundation in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America & National Association of Manufacturers in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Eighteen Criminal Law Professors in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the Honorable Michael Oxley in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Pacific Legal Foundation, Florida Keys Commercial Fishermen’s Association, Southeastern Fisheries Association, Garden State Seafood Association, Commercial Fishermen of Santa Barbara, California Abalone Association, and California Sea Urchin Commission in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner
May a document from a state or local government stating that an application has been denied, but providing no reasons whatsoever for the denial, satisfy this statutory "in writing" requirement?
No comments:
Post a Comment