After six years, every time "they" blame Bush, they are admitting their own philosophical/diplomatic failures.

30 share

You should know,  without debate,  the last two and half years in the Middle East,  have been per Obama “policy.”  His surrender of Syria to a Facist/Jihadist war was his doing apart from anything claimed as “Bush’s fault.”  To sit on his thumb and watch Iran become a nuclear power,  has nothing to do with Bush,  unless one wants to argue that Obama had no choice but to continue the fantasy (from the Left) that was,  supposedly,  the Bush policy.  The fact remains that,  per testimony on June 11,  we no longer know how many centrifuges Iran has or to what degree they are weaponized.  THAT is an extension of the Obama doctrine of “let’s wait and trust,  and see what happens next.” 

Every Arab leader in the Middle East,  whether somewhat “friend” or foe,  has pointedly criticized Obama for his lack of leadership  --  would one claim this,  too,  is Bush’s fault? 

Obama’s favorability rating in both the Arab Middle East and  Israel,  are well below those numbers for George Bush.  How that is not Obama’s own doing,  boggles the mind. 

His much advertised “reset” of Russian/American relations,  was and is,  a laughable joke,  beginning with the embarrassment of the reset button,  itself,  and the use of wrong wording on that PLASTIC TOY   . . . .   an actual toy,  given to the Russian president.  This Administration could not even get the wording correct, and, today, that "reset" is a demonstrable failure as  Putin laughs at Obama and publicly insults Hillary Clinton as “weak.” 

Question:  At what point in time,  can we expect the Obama doctrine to effectively correct the Bush Era??  I mean,  IT HAS BEEN SIX FREAKING YEARS (or "two and a half," if you prefer),  and, still,  nothing.  

Does anyone in this Administration,  not know, that,  for all intent and purposes,  it has run out of time?  Clinton,  as much despised by the GOP as is Obama,  was able to get things done.  Ditto,  Bush  -  more hated than Obama by the opposing party,  yet,  able to get things done,  as well.   

Obama has failed to do what Clinton and all other presidents have done  -  work across party lines and govern this nation.  

When Obama abandoned Iraq two and a half years ago,   pretending this to be an effective policy change,  he opened the books on his Middle East Policy apart from his attachment to the GW Bush "failures."   At what point in time,  will folks see  this “effective policy change,” as a surreal joke,  a sad paradox that is anything but an imagined conflict of terms?      

After six years,  there is no more clearer declaration of failure,  than is found in the phrase,  “Its Bush’s fault.”  When the Progressive Peacenikes’ of our world,  use this tired, old,  excuse,  they are admitting,  AT THE SAME TIME,  that they have no workable solutions.  They simply cannot have it both ways,  and that is why they have lost the “popularity” wars,  just before the coming mid-terms.  

Obama camped on Bush's failures,  back in 2008.  His entire campaign was built around blaming Bush.  He promised he could correct the Bush failures and,  six years later,  his rhetoric parallels,  almost perfectly,  his speeches of years gone by.    

Allowing for  debate,  clearly,  Obama's continuing blame game is proof that he has not been able to keep his 2008, campaign promise(s).  His continuing blame game means,  in practical terms,  that he (Obama) is a demonstrable failure. 

Understand,  after six years,  we are within one quarterly report,  of being (officially) in a second recession;  Iraq is being overrun and possessed by Jihadist;  Afghanistan has become an embarrassing loss;  his negotiations with terrorist is bearing no fruit,  whatsoever;   his funding of Hamas in spite of American law,  has put Israel on the verge of extinction; his "politely wait and see" approach to Iran's nuclear quest,  may have put the whole world in danger,  his silence as to the Islamic persecution of Christian,  and,  especially American Christians,  is criminal,  his failure to create a growing economy as defined by GDP,  and his feckless management of the ObamaCare rollout,  monuments along the way,  that this president is our most failed president in history  -  and it is all Bush's fault.  

 He knew he had no more than 8 years to correct those (supposed) failings,  yet,  in nearly every category,  whether jobs,  GDP,  the full involvement of the workforce, a reasonable - commonsense solution to advancing health care costs,  a growing domestic divide,  the use of executive orders,  the abuse of presidential powers,  and the defacto rule of a rogue president  --  all of which were specifically criticized by candidate Obama,    this leader has failed to reverse any of these complaints,  but has,  instead,  intensified their occurrence.  

He has failed,  across the board.  Blaming Bush no longer absolves him from responsible,  but,  instead,  defines his failures as a two-term,  incumbent president.  

At the beginning of 2009 and his first term as president,  Obama inherited the failures of Bush.  In the beginning of 2013,  and his incumbent term as president,  he inherited his own failings  . . . . . .   and could not correct either reality.  

Time for a change.  He,  clearly,  cannot do the job,  BY HIS OWN ADMISSION.