One of Obama's previously happy ex's is unhappy and outspoken about the mess Obama is creating for future generations.



<<  Ex-Secretary of Defense Gates,  is finally being a bit honest about what is going on in the Obama White House and the multitude of foreign related problems he is creating for future presidents. 

As a candidate, Obama had made plain his opposition to the 2003 Iraq invasion while embracing the Afghanistan war as a necessary response to the 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, requiring even more military resources to succeed. In Gates’s highly emotional account, Obama remains uncomfortable with the inherited wars and distrustful of the military that is providing him options. Their different worldviews produced a rift that, at least for Gates, became personally wounding and impossible to repair. . . .  read the WaPost for the rest of thisstory, here. 

Editor’s notes:  Obama’s “World view” includes a hatred for all things military.  Among other things,  it is his world view that disqualifies him from holding office as “Commander in Chief” of one the most deadly military forces in human history.  He unilaterally violated the after-war treatise signed by the Iraqi’s,  and moved all forces from that country.  It is now back in the hands of very evil men claiming to be religious. 

His war in Afghanistan is a colossal failure and has been,  from the beginning of his efforts at directing this war.  He has never had an exit strategy that did not involve “cut and run,”  a coward’s retreat in the name of peace.  When asked about his definition of “victory” in that war,  he explained that “victory,  in these present times,” is a relatively meaningless concept.  And,  one of the first decisions he made as “commander,”  was to  violate the defense treatise made by Bush with Poland and Georgia for their nuclear defense shields.  The decision was made,  apparently, in an effort to improve relationships with Russia,  but none of us know the reason,  since Obama is not one who defends himself in such decision.  What we do know is this:  he is an amateur as to matters of the military and, two,  he does not know it. 

No comments:

Post a Comment