<< Ex-Secretary of Defense Gates, is finally being a bit honest about what is going on in the Obama White House and the multitude of foreign related problems he is creating for future presidents.
As a
candidate, Obama had made plain his opposition to the 2003 Iraq invasion while embracing the Afghanistan war as a necessary response to the
2001 terrorist attacks on the United
States, requiring even more military
resources to succeed. In Gates’s highly emotional account, Obama remains
uncomfortable with the inherited wars and distrustful of the military that is
providing him options. Their different worldviews produced a rift that, at
least for Gates, became personally wounding and impossible to repair. . .
. read the WaPost for the rest of thisstory, here.
Editor’s notes:
Obama’s “World view” includes a hatred for all things military. Among other things, it is his world view that disqualifies him
from holding office as “Commander in Chief” of one the most deadly military forces
in human history. He unilaterally
violated the after-war treatise signed by the Iraqi’s, and moved all forces from that country. It is now back in the hands of very evil men
claiming to be religious.
His war
in Afghanistan
is a colossal failure and has been, from
the beginning of his efforts at directing this war. He has never had an exit strategy that did
not involve “cut and run,” a coward’s
retreat in the name of peace. When asked
about his definition of “victory” in that war,
he explained that “victory, in
these present times,” is a relatively meaningless concept. And,
one of the first decisions he made as “commander,” was to
violate the defense treatise made by Bush with Poland and Georgia for their nuclear defense shields. The decision was made, apparently, in an effort to improve
relationships with Russia, but none of us know the reason, since Obama is not one who defends himself in
such decision. What we do know is this: he is an amateur as to matters of the military
and, two, he does not know it.
No comments:
Post a Comment