A war on the 1% was used by Stalin (in his implementation of Russian Marxism) and Adolph Hitler (to gain votes in his take-over of Germany). Obama's version of this "war on the One Percenters" is different, however. It includes all who make more than $30,000 per year.

<<<< Tom Perkins is a renowned businessman and a member of the One Percent Club.  I am telling you that his words of warning are critically important to all blue collar, Middle Class,  working Americans because "One Percent" is Obama Code for all who make more than the so-called "poor."  That is nearly everyone who reads this post.  I am retired "blue collar Middle America."  I make far less than 100,000 per year and my taxes have sky-rocketed under Obama with nothing in return.  Again,  I have received NOTHING from this Administration,  and you,  how have you benefited?  Most who read this are being forced to buy health insurance that was not as good as what they had before,  at costs of double and triple,  so that the so-called "poor" and alien populations can have a free ride. There is no recovery,  no jobs,  less and less national security but more taxes on US ALL and more wealth redistribution.  Obama is not a Democrat,  he is a Marxist, or,  at least,  a Marxist academic,  and that is his description of himself.  

Jan. 24, 2014 4:49 p.m. ET readers response to an article found in the SF Chronicle.
Regarding your editorial "Censors on Campus" (Jan. 18): Writing from the epicenter of progressive thought, San Francisco, I would call attention to the parallels of fascist Nazi Germany to its war on its "one percent," namely its Jews, to the progressive war on the American one percent, namely the "rich."

From the Occupy movement to the demonization of the rich embedded in virtually every word of our local newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle, I perceive a rising tide of hatred of the successful one percent. There is outraged public reaction to the Google buses carrying technology workers from the city to the peninsula high-tech companies which employ them. We have outrage over the rising real-estate prices which these "techno geeks" can pay. We have, for example, libelous and cruel attacks in the Chronicle on our number-one celebrity, the author Danielle Steel, alleging that she is a "snob" despite the millions she has spent on our city's homeless and mentally ill over the past decades.

This is a very dangerous drift in our American thinking. Kristallnacht was unthinkable in 1930; is its descendent "progressive" radicalism unthinkable now?

Tom Perkins  San Francisco

Mr. Perkins is a founder of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. Tom Perkins is a graduate of MIT in Electronic Engineering and Harvard University in Business Administration. He is now, or has been, a Director of the following public corporations: Acuson (Chairman), Applied Materials, Compaq Computer, Corning Glass Works, Genentech (Chairman), Hewlett Packard Company, Hybritech, LSI Logic, The News Corporation, Philips Electronics NV, Spectra-Physics, Symantec and Tandem Computers (Chairman).

2 comments:

  1. Smithson is regressive, he lives in the past. He's always bringing up irrelevant comparisons with the past as if they have any bearing on today's reality. The Democrat founding of the KKK is a prime example... no relation to todays white male KKKristian party known as the GOP.

    The top 1% are notorious tax evaders, like the failed GOP candidate Romney. In the corporate world today, and I have friends who are prime examples, the highest trained technicians and scientists make about $150,000... their immediate bosses - the VP's of the company, the CEOs make about $4 million, and often don't even come to work 5 days a week and evade taxes. How fair is that pay structure? These are the people Smithson and his group are CONTROLLED and DUPED by. They have him and the GOP in their pocket.

    http://www.alternet.org/economy/20-richest-americans-are-greedy-takers-not-inspirational-makers

    ReplyDelete
  2. GOP corporate greed illustrated:

    $5 billion was slashed from the federal food stamps program, affecting the lives of 47 million Americans. The USDA estimates that because of these cuts, a family of four who receives food stamps benefits will lose about 20 meals per month.
    But these enormous cuts to food stamps aren't enough for Republicans. They still want to slash an additional $40 billion from the program in the name of reducing spending and federal debt. Republicans love to argue that programs like SNAP - the federal food stamps program – and other social safety net programs put an unfair burden on American taxpayers. Wrong. It's tiny compared to the corporate welfare they endorse to protect the top 1%.

    In 2012, the average American taxpayer making $50,000 per year paid just $36 towards the food stamps program. 10 cents a day.

    Compare that to the average American family pays a staggering $6,000 a year in subsidies to Republican-friendly big business.

    Here's how your $6000 in corporate GOP sponsored welfare breaks down for the avg American family

    1. $870 for Direct Subsidies and Grants to Companies
    2. $696 for Business Incentives at the State, County, and City Levels
    3. $722 for Interest Rate Subsidies for Banks
    4. $350 for Retirement Fund Bank Fees
    5. $1,268 for Overpriced Medications
    6. $870 for Corporate Tax Subsidies
    7. $1,231 for Revenue Losses from Corporate Tax Havens

    ReplyDelete