Can you believe that Obama actually thinks it is possible to "discretely" blow the hell out of the enemy?

With the beginning of Obama’s war in Afghanistan,  the Slickster from Chicago refused to define “victory” as applied to that war,  and,  in fact,  is about to “cut and run” from that conflict,  after being rebuffed by the Taliban in his effort to reach a “negotiated peace.”  

Now,  facing another monumental embarrassment following his drawing of the “red line” around chemical warfare in Syria,  he is speaking of bombing Syria “discretely.” 

“What we’re talking about here is something very discrete and limited. … We’re not talking about regime change here,” stated deputy spokesman Josh Earnest,  speaking for Obama today.

Good grief,  you liberals are pathetic when it comes to waging war. 


He has killed 60 terrorist leaders in Afghanistan with his "death by drone" assault and an additional 5,000 "innocent" civilians in those same attacks.  Just wondering why  “discrete” was not the word of the day for this eventuality.  

No comments:

Post a Comment