Another example of Obama having lost favor with some of his own:

Even those who would support Obama’s  pre-1967 strategies,  when it comes to a negotiated peace in the Middle East,  think he is a failed president,  in this regard.  Take the analysis found in the FinancialTimes,  as an example:

Mr Obama  . . . . . . .  cannot be said to have advanced the cause of Middle East peace  . . . . . .   Nothing can change unless Mr Obama chooses to lead

While the Financial Times is no conservative publication,  it too,  sees the feckless nature of Obama’s failure as a world leader.  The glowing rhetoric of his Cairo speech (2009), as an example,  was followed by absolutely nothing,  in terms of diplomatic negotiations and success.  Hillary, a failed Secretary of State in her own rite, worked under the auspices B Obama.  In the end,  all of this Administration's foreign "policy"  goes back on Obama and his childish view of the world. Wishful thinking and Utopian ideals cannot be considered "policy" mechanics and this Administration has proven this to be true,  in spades.  

Point of Post?  No one thinks this man has set himself apart from any of predecessors;  at least,  no one of import.