Talk about giving a "fair shake," Obama is thinking about the release of the Blind Sheik for "humanitarian reasons." The Sheik would be sent to Egypt. The Administration denies this but . . . . .

<<<<<  Omar_Abdel-Rahman may be released either before or after the coming election (should Obama win).

“No plan to release the blind sheik – no senior diplomats have approached the Administration.”   So says the State Department spokesman.  

Understand that in the Egyptian  president’s  inauguration speech,  some week's ago,   President Morsi demanded the release of the blind sheik responsible for the Twin Towers bombing back in 1993. Keep this in mind,  throughout the day and week,  when the Administration tells us that "no top level diplomat has asked for the release."  Remember,  Morsi is as high as you can get within the Egyptian hierarchy.  

Over the past several days,  this has become a prevailing rumor.  It has been repeated over and over again.  Such is usually a precursor to a similar event,  in real time.  

Is Obama thinking about this release?  Of course he is.  How do I know this?  Because the man believes that compromise and capitalization (appeasement)  as an unilateral response to violence and the promise of violence will secure peace.  

In early 2010,  he surrendered the missile defense shields in Czechoslovakia  and Poland,  against the will of those governments and the US Congress.  In exchange,  he got nothing for his unilateral effort.  

On every turn,  he has thwarted the plans of Israel in its opposition to Iran's nuclear threat,  believing that peace without power will win the day.  

He is pulling American military presence out of the Middle East in toto.  As a result,  Iraq has turned to Iran for partnership and Afghanistan is devolving into an ignominious military loss under his watch and pacifist policies.   

He is in the business, presently,  of taking our nuclear arsenal to zero,  even before any other nation makes that same commitment,  believing that our example will signal the end of the nuclear threat  -  a childish assumption in the face of the many bully-nations in our world.  

And now,  we have his thinly veiled effort at solving the crisis of violence in the Middle East by cowering down to the demands of Islamic leaders.  He refuses to call terror attacks what they are.  Fort Hood has been written off to  "work place violence" and the Libyan disaster is being typified by this head-in-sand Administration as a spontaneous event in response to an anti-Islamic film.  not a terror event in response to the 21 proclamations at the recent DNC of  "Osama bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."  Understand that in addition to mention of the film,  their are signs at every terror event proclaiming,  "We are 1.5 billion Osama bin Ladens."