Yesterday, Obama made
this unbelievable claim:
“I love it when these guys talk about debt and
deficits. I inherited a trillion dollar deficit. We signed two trillion dollars in spending
cuts into law. Spending under my
administration has grown more slowly than under any president in 60 years. They baked all this stuff into the cake
with those tax cuts… and the war. It’s
like somebody goes to a restaurant, orders a big steak dinner, a martini and
all that stuff, then just as you’re sitting down they leave and accuse you of
running up the tab”
Obama
said that the country’s budget deficits and big debt were the result of the
George W. Bush’s two tax cuts, as well as the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. –
B Obama, June 12, 201
Editor’s
notes: Obama pretends that
the Democrats were not in control of Congress beginning with 2007 through 2010,
or, that Bush did not govern as a dictator
(a novel idea to Obama). He wants you to forget that he told the press in
2009, when being criticized for
excessive spending, “All government
spending is stimulus” -- so why is Bush the bad guy for spending? As near as we can see, Bush should be the Democrat’s hero.
Obama’s
Deceptive Claim
Obama seriously hopes
you will forget that he ran for the presidency on the notion that he would fix
the broken economy. He repeatedly told
us the stimulus would end the recession and usher in a new season of robust economic
times. Nearly four years later, he is still blaming Bush as he claims that
his rate of spending increase is less that than any Administration in the past
60 years.
Obama’s
Deceptive Claim Explained
Before Obama, George
Bush (43) was the nation’s biggest spending president. Few on the Right supported this fact, but such is the truth. Bush was the “Biggest Spender” at $450 billion per year in deficit
spending. This includes the wars, the
tax cuts (which actually came in at a zero cost) and prescription drug bill
which nearly every Democrat in Congress voted for including Obama.
Suddenly, beginning
with Obama’s first fiscal year,
beginning in October of 2009, the
deficit jumped to $1.6 trillion (from $450 billion). Obama’s second fiscal year beginning in
October of 2010, saw a $1.3 trillion
deficit with 2011 coming in with the deficit numbers ($1.3 trillion). His fourth year, beginning in October of this year
(2012), will pencil in at $1.2 trillion). When Obama is talking about “the lowest
spending increases in 60 years,” he is
talking about the fact that he jumped the annual debt average from $450 billion
to $1.3 trillion in his first year, and maintained
that unsustainable level of spending for the next three years. Smoke and mirrors.
Good
News for Romney
When Obama came into office,
the national debt totaled just under $10 trillion. By 2016,
the national debt – in part due to Obama spending policy – will be $20
trillion. The good news???
None of it will be the fault
of the new president !!!
___________________
End notes:
Obama
often talks about a Bush deficit of “a trillion dollars per year.” The fact of the matter is this: the only way Obama can get to that
total, is to count TARP, but was spent under Obama’s
administration. Elizabeth Warren was one
of five civilians appointed by Obama, to help in the oversight of that massive
expenditure and, at least half of the
TARP allocations have been paid back. I
do not count TARP into the expenses for either Bush or Obama.
The CBO projected a budget deficit of $1.2 trillion for 2009 before Obama even assumed office. (http://cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9957/01-07-outlook.pdf) The reason was the massive economic downturn. The costs of the government aren't automatically adjusted for the financial crisis, downturns in GDP or spikes in unemployment. This is what the CBO wrote BEFORE Obama was in office:
ReplyDelete"The major slowdown in economic activity and the policy responses to the turmoil in the housing and financial markets have significantly affected the federal budget. As a share of the economy, the deficit for this year is anticipated to be the largest recorded since World War II...
CBO projects that the deficit this year will total $1.2 trillion, or 8.3 percent of GDP. Enactment of an economic stimulus package would add to that deficit. In CBO’s baseline, the deficit for 2010 falls to 4.9 percent of GDP, still high by historical standards."
Obama didn't raise the deficit to $1.3 trillion, it was already headed there before he was even in office.
Furthermore the Bush tax cuts absolutely were not "zero cost." They were effectively a government expenditure of around $1.3 to $1.5 trillion, depending on who's doing the calculations. There's a conservative estimate and how it's broken down here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/revisiting-the-cost-of-the-bush-tax-cuts/2011/05/09/AFxTFtbG_blog.html
In addition, the Democrats did not have control of congress from 2007 to 2010. In fact, only for three disjointed months[1] did the Democrats have a filibuster-proof majority. And, since the Republicans have employed a record breaking amount of filibuster threats[2] since Obama took office, that does not resemble, in any manner, "control of Congress."
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Caucus_of_the_United_States_Senate
2. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Cloture_Voting%2C_United_States_Senate%2C_1947_to_2008.svg