400,000 abortions equals "3%" of what Planned Parenthood does - allowing "them" to say, "No big deal."



<<<< That's right.  The pro-abortionist refuses to call the unborn "babies" or "human beings."  Understand that "fetus" is  a rhetorical dodge that allows for a clear conscience when killing a defenseless young life is the chosen course of action.  


 Campbell Brown / New York Times:
Planned Parenthood's Self-Destructive Behavior  —  PLANNED PARENTHOOD has a large target on its back.  At no time in the organization's history has it faced such a concerted Congressional challenge to its agenda.  But most worrisome is the organization's shrinking number of defenders, and Planned Parenthood has only itself to blame. . . . . . . 

Editor's notes:  while I celebrate the headline as a developing reality,  still,  there is much to be done as we bring Planned Parenthood's misuse of federal funds  into the light of public scrutiny.  In the article above,  we have this idiot statistic -  quoted in  defense of Planned Parenthood :  

 "Despite the claims of its opponents that it’s solely an abortion provider, abortions represent only 3 percent of its work. Almost half of the organization’s funding (46 percent) comes from the federal and state governments".  

The abortionists know,  full well, that this is a BS statistic.  While the claim of the "3%" is nominally correct,  the intention is to make it seem as if abortions are but a small part of the business of Planned Parenthood.  You decide the truthfulness of this implication as you consider this  statistic:  in 2009,  PP aborted 332,000 babies. . . . . . that is a baby’s death every 95 seconds . . . . . . . . . nearly all for purely “recreational ”reasons.  That "3%" ???  It equals the deaths of a third of a million unborn  -  and the 2012 number might be closer to 400,000.  Where PP gets its funding is one thing  -  but to imply that 332,000 aborted children is a "minor affair,"  is criminal,  in my book.  

And now,  PP plans on supporting gender based abortions,  when the political climate is ready for this murderous attention.  Of course, PP denies this,  but it has denied every advancement to abortion,  listed over the years . . . . . . every objection was laughed at,  every charge was dismissed as
ridiculous and hyperbole, but every pro-life suspicion  was evidentially put into practice  --  without exception. Me?  I am sick and tired of being laughed at,  when, in the end,  I am proven to be right  --  over and over and over again. 

Abortion - A Brief History
Abortionists used a single woman, Roe,  who was refused an abortion by Dallas County’s District Attorney,  Henry Wade.   Her life was not threatened by this pregnancy, as required by Texas law.   She later complained that she was lied to by those who used her  and has since expressed deep sorrow at the role she has played in history.
  1. Originally,  abortion was limited to the first two terms of pregnancy. But that did not satisfy the blood lust of the abortionists.  In short order, the health of the host (sorry,  she is not the “mother” or “parent”) was expanded to the mental health of that person,  and third term abortions became legally acceptable.  
  2.  “Pregnancy” was redefined as full birth of a viable baby with the exception of any extremity,  the very top of the head,  or the tip of a finger not yet “birthed.”  Of course,  this opened the door to the so-called  “late term abortion.” Understand that, in this case, a perfectly viable child is born onto the birthing table except for a foot or a finger or the top of its head, and the woman,  still "pregnant,"  can order this child killed,  then and there.  Bastards all for this travesty.  
  3. At the same time,  any demand to save the life of a third trimester unborn,  was legally abandoned. 
  4. In 1976,  parental permission was struck down by these legalist bastards.  
  5. In 1989,  the High Court gave the pro-life lobby its first victory, of sorts. In that decision,  the Court let stand a Missouri law that stated that life began at conception  --  abortionist had no idea when life, as a human,  began !!!
  6. With the ‘89 decision,   some states pushed forward laws that allowed for the re-establishment of parental consent.  A 1990 a  High Court decision ordered  a path to courtroom or judicial review in such cases.  
  7. In 1992,  Planned Parenthood v Casey (the last abortion case to be argued at the High Court), the Supremes allowed for a 24 hour waiting period as well as a record keeping element, a parental consent provision,  an informed consent requirement,  and more liberty given to the individual states in determining “viability.”   
With the decisions of 1989 and 1990,  the abortionists went wild -  threatening demonstrations and civil disobedience.  They made it clear that they would not obey laws that took away the results of Roe v Wade,  no matter the fact that each step along the way, was accompanied by lie after lie,  denial after denial.  For the first time in my life,  I realized that these folks were anarchists,  "tolerant" only because legislation had been moving in their favor.  That was 1990.  More than 20 years later,  I know these folks as the Marxist they claimed to be while in college.  They are the enemy within and their goal has nothing to do with the continuation of a Sovereign United States of America.  


As things stand today,  the Casey ruling is the comprehensive and overriding abortion law ---  much more so than Roe v Wade.  The pro-life lobby has made great strides in its battle against this terrible and inhumane injustice.  

You should know that on the occasion of a reversal of Roe v Wade (if, in fact, that is the pathway to saving the lives of the unborn),  abortion will never be considered "illegal" in all the states in the union.  I am certain that states will have the liberty to develop and pursue their own abortion laws.  Today, 1.4 million abortions occur every year,  at least 1.3 million of them just for the hell of it.  
_____________________

End Notes: 

Much of the above is documented at Abort73.com.  

No comments:

Post a Comment