Rush IS insulting. So what?!


Carly Fiorina: Limbaugh ‘insulting’  —  Carly Fiorina, National Republican Senatorial Committee Vice-Chairman, on Friday condemned Rush Limbaugh for calling college student Sandra Fluke a “slut.”  —  “That language is insulting, in my opinion.  It's incendiary and most of all, it's a distraction. . . .

Editor’s notes: the above is a headline clip from Politico.  I did not link to Politico because I consider the “news” outlet to be a propaganda front for anti-American activities.  While Carly Foirina is not a part of this treasonous cabal,  such “news” articles are used by the white trash at the Politico to advance their implicit and underlying push toward a One World political economy. 

Are the Limbaugh comments insulting?  Well,  apparently some are insulted.  Is Limbaugh’s question relevant, specifically  “What do you call a woman who wants to be paid for sex?”  Certainly.  Did the young student activist lie about her circumstance?  Yes,  unless  you actually believe she jumps in the sack 3 times a day throughout the year.    I don’t. 

I believe this youthful activist conducts herself normally in her daily life,    perhaps having sex once in a while.   But, the only way she can defend her claim of spending $1,000 a year on protection is to admit “doing it” several times a day. 

Is  Limbaugh part of the political establishment?  No.  He is a radio host with convictions for a Constitutionally based representative democracy.  It is the Left, in its desperation to destroy the Right, that ties Rush to GOP policy. 

Should we have this debate? Yes.  Is Carly Foirina an opponent of freedom.  No.  Nor is Rush.  Understand this,  without folks like Rush,  we would not have debates over such matters,  and we need to have these discussions. 

Finally,  as a father,  I would be furious with the admissions implicit within Ms Fluke’s testimony.  

2 comments:

  1. Limbaugh is absolutley part of the GOP political establishment.

    He is the dumbass who said the more sex you have the more contraception costs. Last I knew, the same number of birth control pills work if have no sex or lots of sex. Last I knew, they required a prescription from a physician - which costs money to obtain an appointment. Last I knew, contraception is a responsible and mature thing for a young person to do, instead of multiplying like white trash rednecks in the trailers of rural America.

    How can any self-respecting woman support what that pig Limbaugh said? I'm sure you'll find a way, redneck.

    For not being a part of the political establishment, Limbaugh just lost millions of women voters for the GOP.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Speaking of "dumbass," Limbaugh's discussion of rising costs was in the context of condom purchases, but, how would you know since you do not listen to the man?

    And why did Limbaugh go with the condom strategy to conception? Because you can't get to the $1,000 annual contraceptive cost with the "pill argument." This "student" is a 30 year old activist who entered Georgetown with the expressed purpose of doing what she just did.

    What is more important, here, her $30 a month habit or the conscience provision implicit in the Constitution? But you are not asking that question because you think that any liberal "humanitarian" idea overrides that legal document.

    As to your claim that Limbaugh just lost millions of women votes for the GOP, last I heard from the likes of "you," that battle was lost long before Limbaugh's comments. So, which is it, Slick? When, exactly, did we lose their vote? And how do you know?

    I am fine with waiting for the election.

    Finally, unless you believe Keith Olbermann to be the poster child for the Marxist Dems, Limbaugh is only a member of the conservative movement. He has "power" because so many agree with 99% of what he has to say.

    ReplyDelete