Democrats want a prophet, not a President. They hold dogmatic beliefs that are impervious to contradiction by logic, evidence or experience, and cultivate a moreal superiority toward unbelievers. The party that loudly prides itself on tolerance . . . . . increasingly intolerant.
Editor: "Impervious to . . . logic" includes free college and healthcare costing 8 trillion per year in unsustainable debt. They claim to be the party of science while believing that men can become womens, that trangenderered women (aka "men") should have abortion rights.
They completely ignore that fact that there is no such thing as "tide-rise" (a critical event to the global warming doctrine), or, Hawaii, the Panama Canal, all ocean/border communites world wide and virtually every island in our several oceans would already be under water.
Finally, they believe that the accumulation of wealth is both evil and a zero sum game. But if "wealth" is more than dollar bills, anyone can accumulate or add to their wealth, some more than others of course. And by "zero sum game" I am saying that because Tom Steyer and Mike Bloomberg are trillionairs does not mean that the remainder of the world's population cannot add to it's wealth circumstance. In other words, because Bloomberg has trillions does not mean that there is that much less wealth available to others.
And if I am wrong, please tell me how much wealth is available to the rest of us after Steyer and Bloomberg "steal" our availble wealth? I argue that because no one, and I mean "no one," can quatify available wealth, is evidence that there is plenty of wealth to go around, even if quantified as a zero-sum reality..
No comments:
Post a Comment