An important point in the Nunes Memo is "corrected" by the Post . . . . or is it?

You are left with the impression that the FISA court did not know that the Hillary Campaign had paid for the Steele Dossier.  The memo charges that this fact was omitted.  

The Washington Post pretends to correct this "false reporting," with the following words:  

 The court that approved surveillance of a former campaign adviser to President Trump was aware that some of the information underpinning the warrant request was paid for by a political entity, although the application did not specifically name the Democratic National Committee or the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

Now,  correct me if I am wrong,  but,  after reading the Post's correction,  did the FISA court know that the DNC and the Hillary Campaign had funneled money through Fusion GPS,  to the Russians and their lacky,  a man named Steele,  to produce the Dossier;  that the Dossier was nothing more than opposition research?  The answer is "no." 

Nunes and this blog believe the court was not so advised,  that it should have known, that the entire worthless campaign against Donald Trump as President of the United States, was/is a bogus effort to take down his presidency and install Hallary as president. And,  that the Dems cannot prove otherwise.    We call this a "palace coup."   

Understand that the Dems were plotting to negate the 2016 election and install Hillary as the rightful successor to the presidency,  thus eliminating the entire Trump cabinet,  avoiding any changes to the so-called "Obama legacy." 

Now you know.