Anything factually inaccurate in the four page House document soon to be released against the Democrat wishes?
Editor: Anything factually inaccurate in the four page House document soon to be released? The answer is "no." So, why are they up in arms about its release?
Only reason I can think of: The document proves the involvement of the Dems and their misuse of the FBI, or, it shows the complicity of Barack and his minions.
We already know that in the final year of his administration, Ambassador Powers and Susan Rice were busy unmasking names contained in the FISA files, unmasking to the tune of 500 or more during that final year. Keep in mind that his "home" in D.C., a third dwelling, is really office space for his shadow government, just in case Barack realized he was losing control of the agenda he had left behind.
At any rate, the Dems apparently cannot discredit the memo, although they will certainly come up with a strategy to blunt the impact of this document. I have believed, from the beginning, that the Democrats would come to hate the day they decided to force this made up scandal (Trump as a Russian spy), and that "day" is now.
Me? I spend a lot more time laughing at the Dems than worrying about their lies and misleading agenda.
ReplyDeleteTrump's handpicked FBI Director says the memo is BS . . . .
You think I don't read the headlines, all of them, each and every day? wray said no such thing, period. He only said the "context" for the memo was lacking.
DeleteSo they can tell us the context. The memo is damning of Democrat funding and participation in securing a phony FISA warrent. This whole thing is a fraud and you know . . . . . and the polls show it.