Think about it: If this headline is even remotely true, it means that . . . .

Charles Kaiser / The Guardian: Was Michael Flynn asked to wear a wire in Mueller hunt for evidence on Russia?  

Editor:   Think about it: If this headline is even remotely true,  it means that Mueller simply does not have a case against the President, period.  He has been "investigating" for months and has come up with nothing or he wouldn't need Flynn for anything other than to justify his own feckless  campaign against Trump.  

Having Flynn war a wire is nothing less than an admission, "We do not have a case,  so let's send Flynn after this bunch."  

And,  may I ask,  who the heck would talk openly with Flynn,  now that he is indicted and in need of a deal?  

Of course,  if Flynn wore a wire before going Rat,  well that may be a different matter.  But with that scenario,  why hasn't Mueller come up with a case against Trump by now?  

I think the answer is obvious.