I have suggested that Hillary is actually trying to void the 2016 election and take the presidency by default.

Turns out I am not the only one who thinks this.  Breitbart has an article (see below) dealing with this very premise.  The problem for those who hate Trump,  is Mike Pence.  The Progressives accomplish nothing by taking down Trump.  They need to void the election or the dismantling of the Obama Years will continue.  The only path to this end,  is to void the entire election process.  In my mind,  there is no indication that this strategy can work,  but hoping for the unproven and impossible has never stopped the Dems from dreaming their silly dreams.  The next opportunity,  the only opportunity to derail Trump is to win the 2020 election.  You might respond by pointing to the 2018 mid-terms and the possibility of the Dems taking back both the Senate and the House.  In that event,  there is an opportunity for impeachment,  but the voting requirement for such an action,  is simply not there.  In other words,  even it the Dems win big in 2018,  there will be no successful impeachment of President Trump. 


______________________________
Hillary Clinton is questioning the legitimacy of the 2016 presidential election despite once calling such behavior “horrifying.”
In an interview with Mother Jones released on Friday, Clinton claimed “there are lots of questions about its legitimacy” because of Russian interference efforts and alleged voter suppression. She said the Russian “disinformation campaign…wasn’t just influencing voters, it was determining the outcome.”
Clinton also blamed voter ID laws and “obstacles” to voter registration for her losses in states like Wisconsin, a place she failed to campaign in.
“In a couple of places, most notably Wisconsin, I think it had a dramatic impact on the outcome,” she claimed. “It seems likely that it cost me the election [in Wisconsin] because of the tens of thousands of people who were turned away and the margin being so small.”
She declined to say how she would officially determine the legitimacy of the election, explaining, “We don’t have a method for contesting that in our system. That’s why I’ve long advocated for an independent commission to get to the bottom of what happened.”
When Trump was asked in a 2016 presidential debate if he would accept the results of the election if he were to lose, he responded that he “will look at it at the time.”
“It was horrifying what he said,” Clinton said about those remarks. “We are a country based on laws. And we’ve had hot, contested elections going back to the very beginning, but one of our hallmarks has always been that we accept the outcomes of our elections.”
“Somebody wins and somebody loses. So what he said tonight is part of his whole effort to blame somebody else for his campaign,” she stated at the time.