Midknight Review -- new and revised: The rules for a Trump/Mueller interview should follow the same pattern as that used with Hillary.

The rules for a Trump/Mueller interview should follow the same pattern as that used with Hillary.

Jesse Byrnes / The Hill:
Trump: 'I don't know' if I'll interview with Mueller for Russia probe

And he shouldn't interview or in anyway give this investigation any sense of relevancy. Will his refusal to be interviewed (and he has not made that decision) hurt him politically? Not if Mueller cannot make his case without the interview. I mean, if Comey made his decision about Hillary, before she was interviewed, certainly Mueller can.

Never forget, that Hillary was not placed under oath, was not sworn to tell the truth, was not recorded in any way. In fact, Comey wasn't even in the room, he did not attend the interview.

So, "no," the President should disregard. If not, he certainly should demand that he not be sworn in, that Mueller not be in the room, demand that no recordings be made and interview behind closed doors . . . . . all exactly as was the case with Hillary.

2 comments:

AnonymousOctober 21, 2017 at 2:11 PM
WTF you talking about? Hillary was grilled under oath for hours, on TV.

If he is summoned to testify before a grand jury, he will do it without a lawyer and under oath. I can't wait.

The reason you would not want this is because you are an accessory to his criminality, you know he is guilty and hiding something.
ReplyDelete
Replies
John SmithsonOctober 21, 2017 at 6:37 PM
What a moron. I am talking about the Comey FBI investigation, the only investigation that could put her in jail. Testifying to congress is a waste of time, because Congress cannot press charges for lying.

Comey refused to put Hillary under oath, banned recording devises in the interview and barred all note-taking. In fact, he wasn't even in the freaking room.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Let's return the favor, shall we?

CLINTON: You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength. And you heard how the Republican members led by Mitch McConnell, the president really demeaned the confirmation process.

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."