Update: To be clear, parallels between Hillary and Kushner regarding "back channel" communications are perfectly legitimate. The argument that she was serving her country and Kushner was not, is rather silly. For starters, the "back channel" event occurred after Trump had won the election. No one is going to go after Trump as "president elect" and we all know this. "President elects" often set up lines of communication, so that they can "hit the ground running." Secondly, the Russians came to Kushner . . . . not a crime; not even "ill-advised."
The Fake Story has been around for nearly two weeks, that Kushner tried to create a secret back channel line with the Russians. Truns out that Fox News blows that our of the water with this headline:
Fox News
Jared Kushner didn't suggest Russian communications channel in meeting, source says
— A December meeting between Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's
son-in-law and one of the senior advisers in the Trump administration,
and Russian
In a related story, we have this change of direction for the FBI:
New York Times:
Investigation Turns to Kushner's Motives in Meeting With a Putin Ally
If they are looking at "motive," they really have nothing in terms of hard evidence. Do they really expect Kushner to confess being a spy. What a joke and the investigation is getting more and more embarrassing with the passing of time. Understand that if they had evidence proving motive, motive would not matter (because they have evidence). Again, what a pathetic joke.
"if they had evidence proving motive"
ReplyDeleteHahahahahahahaha!!!!
Please keep believing that... keep it tuned to the failing Fox News.
Tell us, Mr. Fox News guy, why did Kushner LIE on his SF86 security clearance form - which clearly states "false statement punishable by imprisonment?" Why did Flynn, Sessions, Manafort, and Page also lie?
There are two parts to telling a lie: (1) the lie itself and, (2) the cover-up. You should know this, your two hero's, Obama and Hillary mastered both sides of the equation.
DeleteIn Kushner's case, he omitted a couple of names. Omission is not a lie, especially if the omission is corrected within 24 hours, which, in Kushner's case, it was.
Tired of getting your ass kicked? Let me know.
'In Kushner's case, he omitted a couple of names."
DeleteExcept it wasn't just once, and it wasn't just Kushner. Why did Flynn, Sessions, Manafort, and Page also lie?
Keep trying to build yourself up, fat man. It's all about to come crashing down.
Look, Moron, we KNOW that Kushner is not a target of this FBI investigation nor is he being treat as guilty (person of interest) party.
DeleteHillary Clinton and Kissinger both used "back channel" contacts while in office. Nothing wrong with that in their cases or with Kushner . . . nothing. That is why James Clapper, ex-NIA chief told us two days ago, that there is no evidence of criminal wrong doing or collusion. So, go get a real job that requires to actually think critically or get fired or continue to hide behind "anonymous" and the security of the intelligentsia's welfare state (pay and retirement plans included).
Trump getting ready to throw Kushner under the bus.
ReplyDeleteA Sunday report on ABC News’s “This Week” said members of the Trump circle are wondering if Kushner will need to step aside.
Kushner under pressure to take hiatus from White House: report
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/335468-kushner-getting-pressure-to-take-hiatus-from-white-house-report
Who told ABC this? When? and what were his sources?
DeleteOooops, I forgot, anonymous believes "anonymous" is a source, when, in fact, "anonymous" is only cover for the make-believe world of "news" reporting.
Anonymous wrote me: "What happens when you get caught red-handed having done something incredibly suspicious? You float an innocuous excuse, no matter how unlikely, and hope it sticks. Even better, you try to float the excuse in such a way that it sounds like it’s coming from outsiders instead of from yourself. That's what Kushner did through Fox News ...and you gullible Trumptards, bought it."
ReplyDeleteIf Anonymous had only applied this comment to his tin-foil fantasy that Trump has been a Russian secret agent for years. He doesn't even realize how stupid this sounds. But when subversives are busy taking down a nation, they are too involved to admit to any reality.
James Clapper, past head of the NIA, the umbrella agency for the other 16, said, yesterday, that there remains NO EVIDENCE of a Russian connection to Trump.