Notes on defining the opposition to the Donald Trump campaign.

Update comments I made to

In this very brief video, are we watching Jeb lashing out or implicitly confessing to be part of a conspiracy centered in the taks of keeping Trump our of the

  The point of my comments to the above linked headline,  is this:  I believe there is a behind-the-scenes chorus of never-Trump opponents that has been working against Donald Trump since before the primary process.  Jeb knew this has never been about the nomination.  The concern for the Establishment/Elitists is the White House,  where all political power is centered.  

There is a force in this world,  existing in all quarters,  that works against populace governance  (governance by the people) .  Only the European world,  and its offspring,  Canada, Australia,  and the United States,  allow for the will of the people to any substantive degree.  The Pope wants to dictate what his constituents believe.  The American Progressive Movement,  Africa,  the continent that is Russia,  China,  India,  Pakistan,  all of the Middle East except for Israel,  most of South America and Mexico, all of these regions and more (?), have elections from time to time,  but none allow for the degree of liberty we see in (especially) the United States, Canada. Australia and to a far lesser degree,  Europe.  

The  single most powerful influence separating the two worlds is a free and open (stock and industrial) market place.  As much a blessing to freedom as is the Market Place.  it is, at the same time,  a stifling curse,  to populace governance.  When it seeks to control politicians and the political process,  the Market can be and is a tacit enemy.    AND, it is his supposed threat to the Market Place and its relationship to the free world that is at the heart of the opposition to Trump.  They are afraid of him. The so-called "insiders,"  in both parties,  have working relationships with industry and the banking community,  both public and private.  Understand that these people have plans for this country and its future in a global economy  . . . . .  and they see a populace/nationalist campaign as harmful to their future.  The only difference between the folks in each of the two major parties has to do with how quickly we move into a One World scenario and the degree used to maintain that presence.  

There is much much more to this discussion (i.e. Leftist attacks on the importance of private property ownership and their persistent opposition to religious freedom),  but time and space put limits on what we can discuss in this post.