If not all, certainly most of the inner city gangs are part of the Democrat constituency. That's why . . .

Stop and think about it.  If not all,  certainly most of the inner city gangs are part of the Democrat constituency.  So too is Green Peace and its billion dollar domestic terror war against all who do not support their Green Agenda.  You have Union thugs opposing "right to work laws" and using violence to make their point.  These folks are all Democrats.   

I know some will say this is a cheap shot,  but cheap or not,  it seems to me to be the truth.  

But leave Green Peace and Union thugs behind,  for a moment.  For the sake of this post,   I am talking about the affiliation of our inner city gangs,  their parents, families,  and friends,  and their relationship to the Democrats.  

Why do you think the Dems push to weaken most jail time sentencings,  or fight every effort to sweep a district and rid the community of gang members, or demilitarize our local police forces, or open the borders to drug trafficking, or rid the nation of all those pesky marriage related laws, or push for recreational marijuana laws in a number of states, or oppose "stop and frisk,"  or encourage Black Lives Matters,  Al Sharpton and his band of domestic terrorists  (when you are burning down whole neighborhoods,  you are a terrorist) and their cop killing demonstrations?  Why do they kiss up to the likes of the Muslim Brotherhood, or, Lois Farrakhan and his continual calls for open,  in the street,  rebellion against the white man  (as if you and I have anything to do with the faux repression of the modern day black man).  Why is it that the DOJ will ignore the fire bombing of a GOP headquarters in North Carolina, over this past weekend,  or pretend that riots in Baltimore and Ferguson were somehow justified?  Why?  

Because all of these realities involve Democrat constituencies.  They certainly aren't conservative nor Republican.  

And why is it that Skinheads are considered "White Supremacists" while the white leaders in the Democrat Party and the Progressive donor pool on Wall Street are not? 

Look,  the white leadership in the Democrat Party, stays in power by making promises after promises,  winning elections,  and then blaming others for not keeping those promises.  Next election cycle,  they do the same thing, again,  and the drum beat goes on and on and on and on and on.  

Example:  Johnson's "War on Poverty."  50 years ago,  the Dems came up with that one and they renew this "war effort" with each passing election.  Result?  After 50 stinking years,  the poor are just as poor.  So you have food stamps.  You're still poor.  So you have welfare as long as the father's of this nation leave the home  . . . . . .  you all are still poor, and even worse,  your families are fatherless thanks to the welfare rules and regulations coming from the Democrat Party.  

And, why does this happen?  Simple.  If Progressive Socialists kept their promises,  in half a dozen campaign cycles they wouldn't have any campaign promises to offer.  Barack promised "comprehensive immigration" by the end of 2009.  He had super majorities in both houses of Congress,  yet,  nothing regarding immigration got done.  Not one damn thing.  The Republicans did not have enough votes to stop any legislation during 2009 and 2010.  So why didn't immigration get a legislative solution?  Because the Dems needed this controversies to win future election.  

And that is why I see white Democrat leadership and their Wall Street investor pool,  as the true "white supremacists" in this nation.  Only,  these folks are not about race envy.  They are all about class warfare and keeping the little guy down and out.  And they have done an effective job of doing just that.  

Don't get me wrong.  We have the same Progressive types in the GOP,  but there is a big difference, here.  The so-called "civil war" within the GOP is all about this very issue.  There is no such sustainable, parallel effort in the Democrat Party.    Bernie was that opposition,  but he turned out to be a classic partisan hack.  All that crap he said about Hillary?  Turns out he did not believe any of it  . . . . .  and the young millennial population has been left behind,   wondering what Bernie and this election cycle was/is all about.      

Way past "time for a change,"  no?  Too bad it has to be Trump,  but,  it does have to be Trump.  

See you at the polls.