Here is why the birth certificate remains a question for many:

Media Matters for America:
On MSNBC, Senior Trump Adviser Says “Nothing Wrong” With Trump's Birther Attacks On Obama  —  JOY-ANN REID (GUEST HOST): Joining me now is senior adviser to the Trump campaign Jack Kingston, former Republican congressman from Georgia.  Congressman, thank you so much for being here, appreciate it.

Editor's note:  Of course the Marxist Media never truly vetted Barack Obama.  Never.  They never fully examined his ties (if any) to Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam,  a terrorist group calling for the violent overthrow of the United States and its white population.  Barack attend Nation of Islam gatherings (once or more) and the friendship between Jeremiah Wright and Farrakhan is well documented.  He attended Jeremiah Wright's church for more than twenty years,  beginning when Barack and Michelle were in their early 20's,  until the beginning of his two terms as President.  Folks, to this day,  have no clue as to the hate and mistrust Wright has for the United States and its founding documents.  There is simply no way for Barack and Michelle to have attended this church for 20 plus years,  without accepting the harshness of Wright's point of view and his antagonism regarding America.  Such was never vetted,  and Obama's pretense at "discovering" the angst expressed by Wright is an impossible fraud.  

A related question has to do with the theology of the Black Liberation Movement (the religion of Jeremiah Wright,  Barack and Michelle Obama and others),  its ties to Rudolf Bultmann and the black revolution in this country.  You, the reader,  have no clue as to what I am talking about because this was was never vetted by the Marxist Media.  And why?  Because the Marxist Media shares in the philosophy "of the black revolution."

Why is Obama an approving patron of the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that is responsible for the assassination of Egyptians President Anwar Sadat,  in 1981? And how much of the Muslim hatred for America does Obama share?  We don't know because this was never vetted.

As far as his birth certificate is concerned,  when a man takes 5 or 6 years to come up with a certificate any of us could have shared within days of the request,  the response is unbelievable,  at least to me.  Something wrong when a man takes years and years to do what any of us could do in days  . . . . .   period.  
___________________


Here is why I am a nutcase when it comes to Barack's birth certificate" Understand that I do not claim he is not an American citizen.   But, at the same time, I have no answers for the following:

You should know that during the 2008 campaign, Barack visited his dying grandmother, someone he never talked about, in Hawaii, and, the hospital where he was supposed born. He suspended his campaign and took the trip, but refused to allow any of the media to travel with him. No media. No pictures. No itinerary. No validation. Three years later, April 27, 2011, he presents the long form of his birth certificate. No one could find this document before that day, including the press. Why? Why didn't the media simply go to the hall of records, in Hawaii, and produce the certificate? This is an unanswered question to this day, and, that is why there are questions.

Here is my question: how long would it take for the media (or any of you reading this post) to find my birth certificate, after it was decided that they wanted to find that document? How many days or hours would it take someone, anyone, to go to the hall of records in the county of my birth and find the certificate? You do know that birth certificates are public records, right?

The fact that my question remains unanswered, to this day, gives you the reason for the mistrust on this matter, and rightly so.
 


8 comments:

  1. Embarrassing. You've really gone off the deep end.

    It's no wonder that you'd follow Trump's 'cult of personality' who denies the basic principles this nation was founded on: facts and evidence. Right side of history or go with the dumbasses. Smithson goes with the dumbasses... of course.

    The new science denialism is creating an existential crisis like few the country has faced before. For the first time in it's history, Scientific American is speaking out.
    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/donald-trump-s-lack-of-respect-for-science-is-alarming/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know nothing about the principles upon which this country was founded. In fact, your implicit claim is downright laughable. Marxism, Islam and European Socialism have nothing to do with founding of this country.

      Delete
    2. "Americans have long prided themselves on their ability to see the world for what it is, as opposed to what someone says it is or what most people happen to believe. ... A respect for evidence is not just a part of the national character. It goes to the heart of the country's particular brand of democratic government. When the founding fathers, including Benjamin Franklin, scientist and inventor, wrote arguably the most important line in the Declaration of Independence—“We hold these truths to be self-evident”—they were asserting the fledgling nation's grounding in the primacy of reason based on evidence."
      -- Scientific American

      Yes, sadly, you've proven yourself.

      Delete
    3. Here is the funny part, your "reason based on evidence" rejects Gopd, yet you quote the Declaration as if you believe the Declaration, when we all know that Commie Class and the European Socialists in this country, deny the existence of God and the historic implications of the cross. It is this "God" our Founders saw as "the Creator" when they wrote ".. . . . We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. So, go pretend your allegiance to logic and our founding documents somewhere else. Thinking men and women exist here.

      Delete
    4. The first 2 drafts of the Declaration did not contain the word 'Creator' (Jefferson, Adams). It was only added to appeal to the King who felt he ruled by 'divine right.' Jefferson and Adams were not traditionally religious.

      History lesson for Smithson. http://candst.tripod.com/doitj.htm

      Delete
    5. Its not the first two or three or four drafts that matter. It is the lasty. Further, to claim that all authors of the Declaration added "Creator" simply to get on the King's good side, when, in fact, this was a revolution document claiming freedom FROM the King was the call of the day. What a silly comment, but now, you actually know something that is factual.

      Delete
    6. "simply to get on the King's good side" - who said that? It was put in a context that would appeal to the king's understanding of divinity, not appease the king.

      How's it feel to be on the wrong side of history? Part of America that has been and will be rejected.

      Delete
    7. Good grief. The king's pov is the King's pov. To appeal his point of view is to appeal to the King. Creator was a part of the Declaration. It is silly to assume that a bunch of revolutionaries wanted to appeal to the King and/or his pov. The fact of the matter is this: most of the Founders were Christians, many of them were folks who believe in a divine hand (i.e. Deists).

      Delete