Mar 16, 2016
“When they structured our nation, the founders placed trust in three separate but equal branches of government. Co-equal authorities are throughout the Constitution, including Article II, Section 2, where the power to nominate an individual to the Supreme Court is granted to the President and authority is given to the Senate to provide advice and consent. Nowhere in the Constitution does it describe how the Senate should either provide its consent or withhold its consent.
“Today the President has exercised his constitutional authority. A majority of the Senate has decided to fulfill its constitutional role of advice and consent by withholding support for the nomination during a presidential election year, with millions of votes having been cast in highly charged contests. As Vice President Biden previously said, it’s a political cauldron to avoid. Judge Bork learned even after being unanimously confirmed for a circuit court judgeship, the confirmation process for the Supreme Court is unlike any other.
“It’s also important to remember the type of nominee President Obama said he’s seeking. He says his nominee will arrive at ‘just decisions and fair outcomes’ based on the application of ‘life experience’ to the ‘rapidly changing times.’ The so-called empathy standard is not an appropriate basis for selecting a Supreme Court nominee.
“A lifetime appointment that could dramatically impact individual freedoms and change the direction of the court for at least a generation is too important to get bogged down in politics. The American people shouldn’t be denied a voice. Do we want a court that interprets the law, or do we want a court that acts as an unelected super legislature? This year is a tremendous opportunity for our country to have a sincere and honest debate about the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system of government.”
Its different when a black president nominates,
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cnn.com/2016/03/16/politics/merrick-garland-republicans-praise/
Not according to the Biden Rule of 1992, or the Schumer Rule of 2008 or Obama's attempt at a filibuster of a Bush appointee. Besides, Obama is as much white as he is black. No one cares. What we care about is this: the man's a Muslim sympathizer, an anti-White Jesus congregant, a Saul Alinsky socialist . . . . . that is why folks don't like him, besides the fact that he is a jerk.
DeleteGood...Obstruct away the oldest judge nominated in 45 yrs ... and a centrist at that. When Hillary or Bernie become president and the Dems take the Senate (just 4 seats) then you'll wish you had nominated Merrick. Hillary will nominate a much younger and much more liberal justice. Another example of how the dumbass republicans will get their ass handed to them. Too stupid realize a gift when they receive it.
DeleteHe is no more a centrist than you are. Pro abortion, anti-gun OWNERSHIP, and a belief that the Constitution is a living document.
DeleteLook, If we lose this election, the Obama agenda is installed forever along with his reconstituted Supreme Court. He can go to hell. He is done. If Hillary wins, she will get the glory, no our Muslim Wannabee . . . . and if we win the election, I will be laughing at you on your site.