Hopes are high that the courts will side with those who oppose Obama's executive excesses and his own first opinion.

As reported in Breitbart: Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R), who as the state’s Attorney General filed the lawsuit against the president’s executive action predicted the suit would ultimately succeed because “Barack Obama is our star witness” on Tuesday’s “Hannity” on the Fox News Channel.
 “I think we will win [the 26 state lawsuit to stop Obama's illegal immigration by executive memo ~ editor] all the way for one simple reason, and that is, the man you just had on the screen, Barack Obama, is our star witness. 22 times Barack Obama said he did not have the authority to implement this type of measure. And then the day after he signed this into law, he said, quote, ‘I just changed the law.’ 

"The exact wording wasI just took an action to change the law,” per Abbott   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     "those words alone show that he violated the Constitution, and violated federal law” Abbott stated.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    This is [is not prosecutorial  discretion] but   an abandonment of the law by the Obama administration, and then re-writing and making it up. That violates the Constitution.”

2 comments:

  1. I wonder if how Reagan's Immigration Reform bill of '86 would go over today? It granted any immigrant who'd entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty - a total of 3 MILLION illegals got amnesty. Later, George H.W. Bush administration used its executive powers to grant 1.5 million amnesty.

    If a republican does it, it must be ok. If Obama does it, it's illegal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another blatant lie. Obama acted alone and around Congressional approval. The very opposite was true with Reagan. Reagan never circumvented Congress in matters of legislative solution. Ditto for H Bush. Obama is America's only Imperial President. Even FDR functioned with the permission of Congress.

      Delete