Jindal to Obama: ‘Medieval Christian Threat is Under Control — Bobby Jindal on Friday released a statement responding to the president's remarks on Thursday at the National Prayer Breakfast in which he cautioned Americans from getting on a “high horse” when taking a stance against radical Islam …
Discussion: Mediaite, BARE NAKED ISLAM, CANNONFIRE, US News, Ed Driscoll, neo-neocon, The Daily Caller, Washington Post, BarbWire.com and Fox News Insider
No, this is the best headline of the week:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/02/the-foolish-historically-illiterate-incredible-response-to-obamas-prayer-breakfast-speech/385246/
BTW. My two computers crashed this weekend. I will lose everything including your two blogs. I have enjoyed keeping up with you. Would you mind "re-upping" the url's for each. If not, no problem.
DeleteAnd no one is being "illiterate" in their responses to his prayer bk speech. Seriously, nothing that happened to Ghandi, or during slavery or 1000 to 70 years ago have anything to do with the existential threat of violent jihad. I would think that Obama, being the faithful sympathizer that he is, would want to acknowledge the difference between jiahd and his concept of peaceful Islam. Maybe, just maybe, his hatred for America goes deeper that some would acknowledge.
I guess Jindal needs a history lesson on how 750,000 African Americans countless numbers of Native Americans were killed, homes destroyed, displaced ... in the name of Christianity
ReplyDeleteYes, in the name of christianity... look up Manifest Destiny, or Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens justification for slavery.
againh, what does any of this have to do with the current head hunters in Jihad Islam? And when was the last time Christians went on a rampage and murdered their opponents? Please don't point to the Democrat South with your answer. No one I know is including all of Islam in this thing we know as ISIS. It needs to be killed. And if you think that is me on my high horse, pray that I am close by with these killers visit your house.
DeleteDo a Google image search for Jesse Washington. See what you find.
DeleteJesse Washington was a young black man, a teenager, hung (I believe) and set on fire . . . . . . in 1916. Obama and Mr. Anonymous believe that because some Democrat KKK members committed this terrible act, that has something to do with WHETHER OR NOT they will support jihad against the Jihadists, and their answer is "no." And they use this kind of convoluted thinking to justify our doing next to nothing to end a nightmare we made possible when we created the vacuum in Iraq. And what is happening in Iraq, Killers are running wild, Middle East nations are begging for arms, supplies and air support, and Obama and the Left refuse to give them this hel, telling all that "we must not over-react," after all "we are not at war with ISIS, only with those thugs who take the ISIS complaint too far." Jesse Washington was murdered by "Christian" Democrats, in the South and Christians in both parties, worked to change that culture and move away from such tragedies . . . . . . . . . AND WE HAVE. We solved (past tense) our own problem, in this case. Jesse Washington, locically speaking, has absolutely nothing to do with this debate, and Anonymous couldn't have cared less about J Washington before his meager attempt at protecting his president.
DeleteNo, a nightmare we made possible when Bush killed ten of thousands of innocent people in Iraq. Arab countries are dealing with this as they should . You want to pay for another war and see us go into a worse depression like the one Bush put us in and Obama has just gotten us out of? Some people never learn.
DeleteI want the US to be involved in the fight. Air power, arms, ammo and general supplies show be offered to those who are willing to fight . . . . . . the Jordanians, the Peshmerga, the Kurds, Iraq, etc. Libs put their heads in the sand back in WWII days. You would think you peaceniks would have learned your lessons. And Bush did not kill thousands . . . . . but you really don't care about those people, do you? Or is it that you care when Bush was the killer, but not when ISIS is the killer?
DeleteNo Bush didn't kill thousands, TENS of thousands of women and children, after he held hands with and embraced a Saudi Prince who likely helped fund the 9/11 hijackers and muslim extremism worldwide, then released a plane load of Saudis safely back to their homeland after 9/11. ... then plunged the US into a war that cost trillions, put America in a recession and destabilized the middle east. Now you want us to go in again so you can beat your chest and be proud that we're killing a bunch of muslim ragheads?
DeleteSounds like a real bright plan.
Sources other than your own dreamland stats. Most casualties in the Iraqi war were caused by the Muslim jihadists who came to the fight. We killed between 24,000 and 43000 of them, according to the Iraqi Government with 66,081 civilian deaths, again, per Iraqi War logs. During Bush, the cost of combat was round 250 billion per year, or 1 trillion for the 5 year war. Of course, Iraq War costs continued until 2011, under Obama. It was a war sanctioned by Democrats and GOP Congressional membership in a scheduled and official vote of the legislature. No one can put it all on Bush because of this last fact.
DeleteThere was no "tens of thousands," no "trillions" as a cost of the war, itself.
You will not find any recommendation on this blog for a drawn out war, but ISIS needs to be stopped. A well trained military under someone who is not an Islamic sympathizer, could bring ISIS to its knees in weeks. Mr Anonymous seems to care about the deaths of the Iraqi's, but never gives a thought to the thousands murdered by ISIS.