Here is what this blog will be "about," over the coming months.

An ongoing theme for this blog,  over the coming months,  has to do with exposing the radical nature of this Administration.  It has more radicalized "Occupy" type,  revolution minded, and leaders and supporters than any Administration in our history. They view the Constitution as a "white man's document,"  our founders as insufferable slave masters,  capitalism as a greed oriented plot to rob the common man of wealth and enslave him to the One Percent Upper Class,  or, the aristocratic oligarchy, if you will.     Christianity is seen as the "white man's religion," reject so-called "Christian names,"  and view violent revolution as a preferred path to "liberation."


All of the Democrat black caucus is a part of this constituency,  as is Machille and Hussein Obama,  Eric Holder and 40 agents within his DOJ,   most of the decision makers at the EPA,  the BLM,  and some at the IRS.  Van Jones was a 10 year, carded Communist and Obama's "green czar."  Valarie Jarrett was born in Iran and has sympathies for that nation.  Jeremiah Wright was the Obama's revolutionary mentor for more than 20 years.  Bill Ayers was a friend,  albeit,  not a close friend.  The socialist minded national unions (i.e., AFL-CIO and Richard Trumka) support a one world labor movement and finance most of Obama's domestic advances against the freedoms of this nation.  The New Black Panthers are allies,  as well;  Eric Holder,  under Obama's direction,  refuses to use the DOJ to prosecute black on white crime.  Louis Farrakhan is a huge fan of Obama,  and, sees him as the Black Jesus of the modern times.  Most recently,  Obama has enlisted the services of Al Sharpton,  and cedes to Sharpton's anti-police rhetoric and revolution oriented domestic campaign.  
_________
Update:  Keep in mind that Obama supported "Occupy" and has never made a personal/public statement about the murders of the two NY police officers,  three weeks ago.  And the DOJ has never filed any charges against Occupy and the criminal vandalism it uses to make its points.  
__________

More than all this,  know that Che Guevara is given a place of honor within the Congressional Black Caucus and Mao was given a decoration on the White House Christmas tree,  in 2009.  

Clearly,  is past time for some exposure of this Administration.  It is no longer about Democrats and Republicans.  Hillary is a "big government" Democrat.  The Obama's are so much more than this:  they are haters of American,  except as they dream America to be.  
at
Labels:

4 comments:

  1. AnonymousJanuary 5, 2015 at 7:02 PM

    This is a very good summary of how the founding are viewed today in comparison with today's conservatives.

    http://youtu.be/RY0Y7vQF13U

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John SmithsonJanuary 5, 2015 at 10:08 PM

      The reader can choose between the comments of a class clown or a historian in 1:36 hour lectures on "The World Without America" here: http://www.readyforsoft.com/demo/modmelody/vdetail/goKXTXwT_4g/dinesh-d-souza-a-world-without-america.html

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJanuary 5, 2015 at 10:43 PM

      Che was a freedom fighter and a very conscientious revolutionary. In one article I read, recently, siad this: he was single-mindedly devoted to what he saw as the revolution and socialism. Yes, he refused the privilege and luxury granted to other leaders of Castroist Cuba, taking an average wage and working hard in his various government jobs. Compare that to Bush or Cheney.

      Delete
    3. John SmithsonJanuary 5, 2015 at 10:58 PM

      Apparently, you are quoting an article found here: http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/various-authors-che-guevara-why-anarchists-should-view-him-critically. Sadly, you felt the need to misrepresent an article about a murderer, turning it into an article that makes him into a hero. Here is what the article was actually about: "But good looks and bravery camouflage what Che really was. A ruthless authoritarian and Stalinist, who expressed admiration for the Peronista authoritarian nationalists, Che acted as a willing tool of the Soviet bloc in spreading their influence. Even when he fell out with the USSR about the possibility of guerrilla war in Latin America, he still remained a convinced Stalinist with admiration for China and North Korea. He had no disagreements with the Soviets about what sort of society he wanted — a bureaucratic authoritarian state-capitalist set up with contempt for the masses.

      Che may look like the archetypal romantic revolutionary. In reality he was a tool of the Stalinist power blocs and a partisan of nuclear war. His attitudes and actions reveal him to be no friend of the working masses, whether they be workers or peasants."

      Clearly, this is your first time here. It is a 99% bet that if you misquote an article, I will find out, as I did in this case. Naughty, naughty.

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)