62 share
40 is our optimum goal
Dear
Fellow American,
I am sending you this special email because of the urgent and serious nature of new information we uncovered from various sources about the possibility of an imminent terror attack on our border. This exclusive report is reprinted for you below. Please share this email far and wide. As you might imagine, I do not believe the Obama administration and other politicians in Imminent Terrorist Attack Warning By Feds on US Border
Islamic
terrorist groups are operating in the Mexican border city of
Specifically,
Judicial Watch sources reveal that the militant group Islamic State of Iraq
and Greater Syria (ISIS) is confirmed to now be operating in Juarez, a
famously crime-infested narcotics hotbed situated across from
Intelligence
officials have picked up radio talk and chatter indicating that the terrorist
groups are going to "carry out an attack on the border," according
to one JW source. "It's coming very soon," according to this
high-level source, who clearly identified the groups planning the plots as
"ISIS and Al Qaeda." An attack is so imminent that the commanding
general at
The
disturbing inside intelligence comes on the heels of news reports revealing
that U.S. intelligence has picked up increased chatter among Islamist terror
networks approaching the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. While these terrorists
reportedly plan their attack just outside the
The
administration has also covered up, or at the very least downplayed, a
serious epidemic of crime along the Mexican border even as heavily armed drug
cartels have taken over portions of the region. Judicial Watch has reported
that the U.S. Border Patrol actually ordered officers to avoid the most
crime-infested stretches because they're "too dangerous" and
patrolling them could result in an "international incident" of
cross border shooting. In the meantime, who could forget the famous words of
Obama's first Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano; the southern
border is "as secure as it has ever been."
These
new revelations are bound to impact the current debate about the border
crisis and immigration policy.
|
Sincerely,
Tom Fitton President |
 |
You want an attack. And if there is... it will all Obama's fault.
ReplyDelete(Unlike 9/11 that happened on Bush's watch)
C.I.A. repeated the warnings all summer 2001. Operatives connected to Bin Laden reported on June 29, that the planned near-term attacks to have “dramatic consequences,” including major casualties. On July 1, the brief stated that the operation “will occur soon.” Some of the briefs again reminded Bush that the attack timing was on track.
Yet, Bush failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counterterrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counterterrorism group, one official even suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place... the White House was doing NOTHING.
That same day, Ibn Al-Khattab, an extremist who was known for his brutality and his links to Al Qaeda, told his followers that there would soon be very big news. Within 48 hours, an intelligence official told me, that information was conveyed to the White House, providing more data supporting the C.I.A.’s warnings. Still, Bush did NOTHING.
On July 24, Mr. Bush was notified that the attack was still being readied, but that it had been postponed, but by just a few months. But Bush did NOTHING. Then ... the famous Aug. 6 CIA briefing entitled "Bin Laden determined to attack in US." Bush received it DID NOTHING then went on vacation ... FOR A MONTH.
In the aftermath of 9/11, Bush officials attempted to deflect criticism that they had ignored C.I.A. warnings by saying they had not been told when and where the attack would occur. That is technically true, but it misses the point. Throughout that summer, there were events that would have exposed the plans, had Bush heeded the warnings. Even as the Aug. 6 brief was being prepared, Mohamed al-Kahtani, a Saudi believed to have been assigned a role in the 9/11 attacks, was stopped at an airport in Orlando, Fla., by a suspicious customs agent and sent back overseas on Aug. 4. Two weeks later, another co-conspirator, Zacarias Moussaoui, was arrested on immigration charges in Minnesota after arousing suspicions at a flight school. But the dots were not connected, and Bush did NOTHING.
Now, it's time my friends to hear from "Smithson... the excuse machine" to tell us how it wasn't Bush's fault, how the blame 9/11 is on Clinton, and everything bad in the world is Obama's fault.
The planning for 9/11 took place in the last two years of the Clinton Administration. IN a Times article written in 2005, we have this commentary" "The New York Times, reporting on Judicial Watch’s find in 2005, noted: “State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osama bin Laden’s move to Afghanistan would give him an even more dangerous haven as he sought to expand radical Islam “well beyond the Middle East,” but the government chose not to deter the move, newly declassified documents show.”
ReplyDeleteYour comments are a plagiarism of an article written in the NYTimes by a avoid conservative and Bush hater. In the article you plagiarize, there is the admission that there were no specifics to the warnings sent to Bush 33 days before 9/11. But, again, what about Bill Clinton's failures in this. His legal counsel erected communications walls between the several intelligence agencies, preventing the sharing and confirmation of information. While the CIA was warning Bush and Clinton, the warnings were a mixture of conflicting information because of the Jamie Gorelick walls.
Just to be clear: your comments are a plagiarism of KURT EICHENWALD written two days before the Benghazi murders and the Obama Administrations cover-up.
Bush apologist - so says a Marxist Defender. It is a historical fact that all of 9/11 was planned during the last two years of Clinton. It is a historical fact that Clinton and his CIA director, George Tenet, were the ones who told Bush about the WMD's. It is a historical fact that Jamie Gorelick, Clinton's legal adviser, put up barriers between the various intelligence agencies. It is a historical fact that the warnings given to Bush did not include specifics and no one ever suggested a passenger plan attack on the Twin Towers.
ReplyDeleteThere were indeed several reports prepared within the CIA, the Aviation Administration, and elsewhere in the Government about the threat of planes as missiles. The Department of Defense had conducted drills for the possibility of a plane-as-missile attack on the Pentagon. When Rice and Bush attended the G8 summit in Italy in July 2001, the airspace was closed because of the threat of an aerial suicide attack by al-Qaeda.
ReplyDeleteThe PDB Bush received a month before 9/11 was entitled "bin Laden determined to strike in US" mentioned specifically:
"a Bin Laden cell in New York was recruiting Muslim-American youth for attacks"
"Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft"
"patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings ... including recent surveillance of buildings in New York."
"Bin Laden implied in U.S. television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef"
Let's hear from the Smithson excuse machine.
CAN YOU imagine... If Obama had received these same exact warnings and went on vacation for a month, and then an attack on his watch .... what would Smithson be spouting then?
Again, no specifics were given to Bush; all of 9/11 was planned during Clinton's final two years; the threat of WMD's came from Clinton and his CIA, and "regime change" was a plan for Saddam's Iraq devised by Bill Clinton.
ReplyDeleteThat last sentence is a riot. Obama was told about ISIS 4 freaking years ago, according to a West Point report released Thursday. Iraq begged him from help a year ago this month. Iraq is a mess because of Obama, and he continues to be an impostor when it comes to national security.
He knew of the ISIS threat, but was too busy winning elections on the lie: GM is alive and al Qaeda is dead. Just wait until Americans are killed in Iraq or here at home, because of Obama's malfeasance. You will love the articles I write about those eventualities.
ReplyDeleteOh, and when has ISIS attacked America and how many have been killed compared to 9/11? ..and suddenly you're worried about dead Iraqis ... after Bush killed 100,000+ .
ReplyDeleteYou want dead Americans. You need dead Americans for your rants.
John "the Bloody" Smithson.
I care about the 4500 Americans killed giving the Iraqi people a shot at freedom. If we had stayed (Status of Forces agreement), and continued an aggressive diplomatic effort, it would have worked. Instead, Obama announced a strong and healthy Iraq, and left the struggling State, giving Russia, Iran, and ISIS an opportunity to turn the Bush victory into an Obama defeat.
ReplyDelete100,000 killed by Bush? Just another Alinsky style lie. How many did al Qaeda kill? Try "100,000" and you would be close.
You accuse me of wanting dead Americans. I am telling you that you don't care about dead American soldiers or you wouldn't have support Obama's cut and run policy, making the deaths of 4,500 Americans an absolute waste of human life. This is why the military shows a 65% disapproval rating for B Hussein Obama.