No mon, no fun. Three signs that are predictive of a Wave Election for the GOP, this coming November.

24 share
good readers interest
1.) Hillary,  considered the front runner in the Democrat Party,  but not a "shoe-in,"  is experiencing a collapse in her book sales.  Disinterest abounds on a national level.

2.)  A California billionaire named Steyer,  pledged a 100 million dollar fund to Democrats who ran on ObamaCare and the environment  (i.e. Global Warming).  He made this pledge close to a year ago,  and has collected donations totaling less than 3 million dollars to date. Most importantly,  the election is just  17 weeks from now.  Typically,  less than 7% of the voting population has not settled on their vote.

3.)  The GOP Governors Association has collected $23 million dollars in the same period of time the Democrat Governors have collected $12 million,  a huge gap with an election looming in the very near future.

2 comments:

  1. Smithson lies revealed:
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/alinsky.asp

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the article you reference, we have this nonsense:

    The articles first attack deals with something no one I know, believes. It is a straw dog comment. The “fact-checking libs” write this point: “However, they never met: Alinsky died of a heart attack in 1972, when Barack

    Obama was but a ten-year-old child living in Hawaii.” Never mind that NO ONE I know claims the two men ever met, certainly not me.

    Its second argument is another straw dog that no one I know is making. It includes a list of some sort, not of my creation. These “fact-checking” clowns write: “The above-quoted list of steps for ‘How to create a social state,’ circulated in January 2014, is another example of a political linking of the names of Saul Alinsky and Barack Obama.” Again,

    Alinsky was the god of community organizers, and his book remains in print precisely because it remains the guide for social reform, used by these maggots. Your fact checkers fail to even deal with this claim, much less disprove it.

    In the beginning of their article, they state the issue correctly but, then, don’t go anywhere near its correctly stated claims. The article begins with this claim:

    “Obama was influenced by the writings and philosophies Saul Alinsky, author of the book, ‘Rules for Radicals,’ and later by Frank Marshall Davis, with similar philosophies. Barak Obama followed the philosophies of these 'role models' throughout his days as a Community Organizer for ACORN, using tactics that appeared to some as 'shaking down' businesses in exchange for not branding them 'hate groups.' And apparently Obama is still following those radical rules today. “ Like I say, the fact checkers never deal with their own statement. The “list” is not mine. The claim that the two men were contemporaries, is not my mine. But the opening statement as quoted above, could have been mine. It is precisely the truth and that summary, is precisely what is ignored in the fact-checking article.

    ReplyDelete