The single unifying concept giving definition to all of Obama's presidency is this: He wants to be seen and remembered as America's first rogue, ant-traditional, president. That being true, he cannot afford to care what anyone including his own party, thinks of his decisions.

33 share

<<< "My way or the highway" is the theme of all of Obama's administration.  Here is why:  

Breitbart, here,  tells us that,  although members of Obama’s inner circle are willing to defend his decision to trade the Taliban Five for a deserter,   all (including Eric Holder) advised Obama to give Congress the 30 day notice required by a law,  he,  himself,  signed. 

Secretary of Defence [sic] Chuck Hagel told the BBC in Romania that he and Secretary of State John Kerry, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey, the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Attorney General Eric Holder all came to the same conclusion to give Congress a 30-day notification on the decision to swap U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five top Taliban commanders. 

There is no greater proof of Obama’s rogue intentions,  than this particular event.  Clearly,  Obama acted in disregard of all or most of his own advisory team and Democrat leadership.  He does not allow for the vitality of opposing opinions,  because,  quite frankly,  those opinions,  if allowed,  would spell the end of his efforts to "fundamentally transform the United States of America." 
  

He actually WANTS to be remembered as a rogue/revolutionary president,  the first of his kind.  With that [political theory] in mind,  we have the TOE** (** Theory of Everything)  for this man’s actions.  He is not ambivalent to his unpopularity or the growing angst within his own party.  Rather,  as a rogue revolutionary,  he simply cannot afford to care. 

Unless you have been sleeping throughout the last three years,  you know that NONE of his personal agenda have been popular;  not ObamaCare and the host of lies told by Obama and his stooges,  not the 2009 Stimulus,  not Dodd/Frank,  not his repressive, anti-business, tax/regulations,  not his support of Hamas and Islam,  not his opposition to Israel,   not his efforts against global warming,  not his war on coal,  not his decision to stabilize sky-high gas at-the-pump prices,   not the specifics of his “war on women,”    not,  even,  his $15 per hour minimum wage proposal, and most definitely,  not his desire and conviction to “rule” the nation as he sees fit, unilaterally,  apart from and in defiance to,  Congressional partnership and oversight.   

This blog intends to begin developing themes defining “Obama’s Legacy.”  The long and short of this effort,  will be the obvious:  Obama and his wife,  want to be seen as anti-colonial,  world without borders,  Marxist inspired,  revolutionaries. 

While some on the Left,  will argue this conclusion,  the fact of the matter remains,  this is the only and, therefore, best explanation for his brand of [convoluted] radical “reform.”