Salon.com makes up its own headline and falls on its own sword of incompetence.



GOP’s sudden scandal-mania: Why criminal probes and infighting are taking over the party

From Walker and Christie's falls from grace, to revived Tea Party hostility, here's why the party is coming apart 

********

Editor's notes:  As it happens,  Christie and Walker are front runners within the GOP,  Walker being the more successful (across the board) of the two governors.  The teaparty types,  with their drive to return to law and order,  controlled spending and fairness to all, is the single most critically important political force in town.  None of these entities have ever been charged with a crime,  yet,  some in the American Marxist Movement continue to beat that drum.  

The Progressives/One World cabal knows its future is sorely limited by such political concerns,  so they do whatever they can,  tell whatever lies they think need to be told,  to "take these people out."  

The headline is proof of this very strategy.  

No charges were ever filed, in the "traffic scandal"   ---  yes,  I said "traffic" scandal  --- against Christie.  In fact,  there was no evidence of his knowledge of this bridge slow down before it happened,  none.  Christie stood his ground and Salon related affiliates,  lost that battle.

The teaparty,  a "movement,"  not a unique political party,  has been accused of all sorts of violence and racism  without a single piece of evidence indicting the movement.  Reports stating otherwise,  are created to hide the corporate lies,  cover-ups,   systemic racism and sheer violence  of the Democrat Party and its affiliates  -  and hard examples of all of this,  abound.  The 2010 midterm elections were a testament of the viability and success of the teaparty movement,   a midterm election cycle that was historic in its results,  a political butt whipping not seen in the modern era.  

Governor Walker was charged with being involved in a "national criminal concern within the GOP,  designed,  secretly,  to funnel cash and effort in a clandestine effort to sabotage honest and open elections."    Sounds a little "mafia,"  no?  But that was the design of the headlines and the "investigative" effort.  

Turns out,  this story,  which broke into national news yesterday,  was exposed beginning weeks ago.  Two judges,  a state appellate judge and a federal district judge shut down this propagandized "investigation,"  before it became [partisan] news,  the judges finding no credibility at all in that which was presented to their courts.  By the time this blatant lie made "news,"  it was ALREADY a dead issue.  By Monday,  this story will be a distant memory,  precisely because of its silliness and criminal deceit.  

Conclusion:  The GOP is certainly not falling apart,  although Commie Concerns use this tiresome strategy every single election cycle.  Environmental terrorism, systemic to the Progressive/Anarchist Movement (PAA),  in this country,  is a criminal effort responsible for billions of dollars of damage to our economy yearly.  Teaparty conservatives has no such criminal enterprise.  PAA Union thugs continually threaten non-union shops and destroy non-union businesses and equipment,  on a regular basis.  Conservatives believe a man or woman should have the right to work freely,  with or without union membership.    And,   "scandals" are invented (for the most part) to hide the real scandals of the Progressive Anarchists and their willingness to subvert law and order to their advantage.  

Expect more of the same.  Sometimes it works for them,  sometimes  (2000, 2004 and 2010) it does not.  

2 comments:

  1. A non-scandal... unlike this one:

    Remember this one from 2007?
    Millions of White House e-mails may be missing, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino acknowledged Friday.

    “I wouldn’t rule out that there were a potential 5 million e-mails lost,” Perino told reporters.

    The administration was already facing sharp questions about whether top presidential advisers including Karl Rove improperly used Republican National Committee e-mail that the White House said later disappeared.
    The actual number of missing emails, we later learned, turned out to be 22 million.

    At issue were a variety of Bush/Cheney scandals, including the firing of U.S. Attorneys who refused to politicize federal prosecutions before elections. To that end, the Republican White House failed to comply with subpoenas, claiming the emails had vanished because the administration failed to comply with the Presidential Records Act.

    The Bush/Cheney spokesperson at the time, Dana Perino, told reporters at the time, “We screwed up.”

    Not to say that the two administrations are equivalent, and that’s OK for one to lose emails and not the other. The difference is, there was credible evidence that the Bush White House had engaged in actual wrongdoing, raising the possibility that the missing emails included potentially incriminating evidence, all of which went missing under suspicious circumstances.

    In contrast, no one has yet produced any evidence that the IRS “controversy” is real.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Still, the point of my post stands without debate. I don't have time to research this, but I certainly do not remember this being in the news. Understand that I have come to view Bush more critically, with the passing of time. Not because of Iraq, but because of his utopian alliance with the fantasy reformers of our time.

    I will say this: what Bush did does not justify what is going on, now. Did he actually lose those emails honestly? By contrast, do you expect me to believe that 7 IRS agents, under investigation, all have their emails destroyed, their hard-drives vaporized and their servers completely "washed," written over, "clean" - all at the same time and for honest reasons? Surely you can see why I cannot go there. Should Bush have been held accountable? I would say, "Yes," after an investigation was completed. Apparently there was no investigations . . . . and that is a fact in a Congress controlled by the Democrats. So why did the Dems not go after the man they hated? Gots to be a reason besides they are all a bunch of really nice people.

    Your closing statement is silly. No evidence leading back to the WH. Seriously - after 25,000 critical emails have vanished and the thousands given to the House Committee are 80% redacted or not compliant with House subpoenas. at all. In fact, the reality of 360 conservative groups targeted to "zero" liberal groups, is evidence enough for me. The fact that we have an email in which Lerner wanted to "piece together" statements to make it appear that conservative groups were guilty of criminal conduct is more proof.

    ReplyDelete