Breitbart.com: The
permanent political class and their donors think a Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton
battle in 2016 would be a win-win scenario, and many Republican Wall Street
donors would rather have Clinton in the White House than Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
or Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY).
According to a Politico report,
"the darkest secret in the big money world of the Republican coastal elite
is that the most palatable alternative to a nominee such as Sen. Ted Cruz of
Texas or Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky would be Clinton."
Understand that neither Cruz nor Paul would strike against
the Street as has Obama. From a business
perspective, there is nothing Wall
Street fears, in these two men. As a result,
there will be no campaign against either man, in spite the assumed “preferences” stated in
the Breitbart comment.
Unless Warren takes the nomination away from Hillary, the Market is looking at more reasonable
times, regardless who runs and wins the
presidency in 2016. Make note that Elizabeth Warren is not mentioned in the Breitbart article.
________________
Related:
Understand that Warren is as duplicitous a Progressive as Boehner is a duplicitous conservative. Her rhetoric puts her in the anti-business class. But, she served as chair to the over-sight committee surveilling TARP. I say "duplicitious" because of her association with TARP.
Before TARP, the Market lost 700 points in a single day (September of 2008). After TARP, the Market lost another 4000 points while investor banking concerns were given more than 7 trillion dollars, funneled through TARP, without so much as a whimper from the likes of "middle class crusaders" including Elizabeth Warren and the know-nothing Barack Obama. In fact, "seven trillion" is the low end of what funneled via TARP, 24 trillion being the high end of that estimate.
As a studied, One World socialist, she believes the dynamics of both the domestic scene and the banking world can be controlled via regulation and law, and, in this thinking, she is an "anti-business, socialist reformer," but, more specifically, she is "anti-small business." Such is the case, because it is small business, with less money and fewer options, that is damaged by increasing federal regulations.
________________
Related:
Understand that Warren is as duplicitous a Progressive as Boehner is a duplicitous conservative. Her rhetoric puts her in the anti-business class. But, she served as chair to the over-sight committee surveilling TARP. I say "duplicitious" because of her association with TARP.
Before TARP, the Market lost 700 points in a single day (September of 2008). After TARP, the Market lost another 4000 points while investor banking concerns were given more than 7 trillion dollars, funneled through TARP, without so much as a whimper from the likes of "middle class crusaders" including Elizabeth Warren and the know-nothing Barack Obama. In fact, "seven trillion" is the low end of what funneled via TARP, 24 trillion being the high end of that estimate.
As a studied, One World socialist, she believes the dynamics of both the domestic scene and the banking world can be controlled via regulation and law, and, in this thinking, she is an "anti-business, socialist reformer," but, more specifically, she is "anti-small business." Such is the case, because it is small business, with less money and fewer options, that is damaged by increasing federal regulations.
No comments:
Post a Comment