The war on poverty was to make blacks a permanent Democrat class. Abortion was a gimmick too eliminate poor blacks from the larger population.

86 shares
Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong ~ Margaret Sanger.  
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2009/07/103457/#okyz4msllMA54koD.99



Understand that the war on poverty has spent 7 trillion dollars since the mid-1960's,  and the black community remains blindly committed to the Democrats while suffering terrible unemployment and the highest rates of educational and financial disparity of any constituency in this country.  

Those of us who oppose abortion,  have known for years and years that abortion was intended to be a solution to unwanted populations,  within this country.  We have know for decades,  that the KKK was  Democrat invention designed to hold blacks "in their place."   We have known for years that Jim Crow laws were ALL written,  by empowered Democrats.  Not one Jim Crow law was the creation of Republicans.   We have known for years,  that welfare enslaves,  but since the descendants of the Democrat Party invented slavery,  who in that party,  really gives a whoot?  






6 comments:

  1. racists...

    https://gopquotes.wordpress.com/category/racism/
    http://thedailybanter.com/2013/01/yes-the-republican-party-is-racist-and-heres-why/
    http://www.thenation.com/article/165576/gops-blatant-racism

    ReplyDelete
  2. My posted facts are the facts. You can quote all the liberal lies you want, but LBJ said what he said. So to did Sanger and Ginsburg. Plus the fact remains that blacks are the most abused constituency in the US and the abusers are "their deliverers." Obama has done nothing to deal with black educational and financial inequality. Those are the facts.

    Let's not forget that Woodrow Wilson and FDR were such racists as Democrat Presidents, that each segregated their militaries during each of the World Wars. In fact, FDR refused to honor Jesse Owens in 1936.

    nearly 4,000 blacks were murdered, the homes and churches burned to the ground, all by Democrats who ran the country during segregation. It was the descendants of the Democrat Party that forced the Civil War in which 500,000 Americans died.

    Their are individual racists in both parties. The Republican Party had its beginnings with Lincoln as they fought Democrats in the Civil War to free the black slave. Martin Luther King, Jr was a Republican. The Civil Rights bill of 1964, under LBJ, was rejected by LBJ when he was Speaker under Eisenhower. It was thje Eisenhower bill that was the basis for the '64 law and a higher percentage of the GOP voted for that bill, than did Democrats.

    Blacks in the GOP are responsible, well spoken, and appreciative of our countries foundations. Democrat blacks think Hugo Chavez was a good guy and Fidel Castro, a hero and are as communist oriented as possible.

    You have to quote liberal opinion. I only quote historical fact.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This further demonstrates Smithson is not living in today's reality. He is always referencing events from 40 - 100 yrs ago. A symptom of a true regressive, to live in the past and ignore what is going on today.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You all "reference" many of the same history realities (i.e. the KKK, racism in the segregated South, the claim that the GOP is the party of racism and national ethnic divide, etc). Sooooo, it is alright if you do it, but not if I tell the truth about past events?

    Heck, you all still bring up Reagan and Bush 43 -- ancient history, as well. Talk about bringing up issues that are 100 years old, you all go back 240 years, and bring up the slave trade and racist white Founders, as you try to overthrow our government.

    The communist inspired Congressional Black Caucus, is a current eventuality. The now defunked "Occupy" anarchist movement, so much more a threat to law and order and a free society than the Bundy family ever dreamed of being, is a current event. You all still burn down new housing tracks under construction, break in and release research animals while pretending to be "pro-science," send your union thugs into countless non-union shops, harass folks who disagree with your beliefs to the point of shutting down their businesses or, at least, vandalizing them. You scream "democracy" while working feverishly for one party rule, often trying to convince Obama to function as a dictator. You run more than 80 “sanctuary cities,” in clear violation of a number of established laws. You send illegal guns to Mexico and then stonewall congress after two border agents are murdered with those guns . . . . . your guns. You screamed about waterboarding, then develop and maintain a drone killing policy that murders 8 innocent civilians, in or near Pakistan, for every terrorist leader you claim to have killed. So much for your allegiance to "democracy," the rule of law, congressional compromise for the sake of getting things done (Reid is holding 260 bills sent to him from the House, refusing to all a vote or, even, discussion - and you think that is just fine). You all do not believe in writing and passing budgets, per federal law, and have not done so, since Obama became our Overlord.

    You and your ilk are nothing but a bunch of phonies, lying to the people without impunity, when public opinion (democracy ??) works against you. You do not give a crap about “what the people” want and the workings of a representative democracy. You ONLY care about what you all believe . . . . . . the people and the Constitution be damned.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Innocents killed by drones? How many innocents did Bush kill in Iraq?
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/10/131015-iraq-war-deaths-survey-2013/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sorry, but did you just concede my point? Because you sure as hell did not deal with the facts of my response.

    ReplyDelete