With the 2008 election under his belt, B Obama decided that he did not need the workingman's vote. Today, his socialist Progressive Party is about to pay the price for that nonsense, unless they can change the tide of popular opinion.

Unconvinced by Democrats

Percentage of white men voting for a Democratic presidential candidate

College graduate

40%

30

No college degree

20

10

0

’84

’88

’92

’96

’00

’04

’08

’12

Source: National exit polls

<<<   You are looking at a huge problem for the Democrats and the saving grace for the GOP.  Namely,  a charted history of white male voters,  in this country.  

The upward trend of white males voting "Democrat,"  began just before Bill Clinton,  and was an established fact of life,  during his tenure as president.  During those years,  37% of the white male vote went to Democrats.  The Bush years brought an end to that reality,  with white men voting for Democrats only 34% of the time.  

In 2008,  with the advent of B Hussein Obama,  there was an admitted spike,  dispelling the notion of "rampant racism" within the white male community.  By 2012,  that reality had been completely reversed, however,  by an Obama election strategy that overtly/deliberately ignored the white blue collar vote.  And,  that voting block responded in kind.  

Now that Obama is on his way out,  a lame duck since March 23, 2010,  and the passing of the "Affordable Care Act,"  his "take no prisoners" and his antagonism against the working/non-union white man,  has created a very real problem for the Democrat Party in the coming 2014 and 2016 elections.  

The New Democrat/Socialist Party was soundly defeated across the board,  in the 2010 midterms.  800 Democrat state legislative positions flipped from Dem to GOP,  30 state governors were elected or re-elected to office,  6 seats were picked up in the Senate and House Democrats,  under the leadership of the most profoundly liberal House Democrat speaker of all time,  Nancy Pelosi,  lost their hold on that legislative body.  That was 2010. 

2012, saw Obama win a second term.  What was not reported,  however,  was the fact that an estimated 6  million projected Democrat voters,  did not show up for that election, with the hard-count,  vote total,  for Barack Hussein, coming in at 1.2 million less than in 2008.  Instead of building on the '08 total of 66.9 million votes,  hoping to take that vote total over the 71 million mark for the first time in history,  the Dems brought in just over 65 million,  more than 6 million short of their national goal.  While Romney lost that election,  he garnered 2.4 million more votes than the feckless John McCain.  Obama had bragged about being able to win elections without the blue collar vote,  and his mindless Progressive associates had climbed on board,  with this assumption.  Now,  a growing population of Boobs,  has decided that such was not a sustainable strategy.  

Today,  the Democrat Party is in far worse elective shape than in 2010,  and the white man,  who voted for Der Slickster in 2008,  has told the New Socialist,  anti workingman party,  to go to hell. The leadership within that party, is beginning to realize the folly of having alienated the white male vote.  Evidence for this conclusion is a whiny article written in the NY Times,  on March 2.   Problem:  they are going to have to live with this failed strategy through two election cycles.  The damage done to the Progressive Movement is already "in the bank," and vote totals are the only unknown  . . . .  but it will not be good.    

Me?  I think their stupidity is both predictable and humorous.  I have written,  over and over again,  that the Obama's are the worse thing to happen to the Democrat Party . . . . . . . .  ever.  Time seems to be proving me correct in that claim.