One would think that an inept magistrate would eventually sit down and shut up, but with the new Irainian "peace at any price" deal, the hits just keep on coming.

About yesterday’s “deal” with Iran: In short, it was nothing more than a slap in the face to Israel and a demonstrative show of contempt for all who seek peace in the Middle East.   

It is a six month agreement that allows Iran to continue making and spinning its nuclear centrifuge arsenal while giving that country reprieve on 8 billion dollars previously tied up by a policy of harsh sanctions.  "They" get eight billion dollars of relief  and the right to continue with their nuclear program as the two sides negotiate for a substantive agreement to be signed six months from now, and,  we get . . . . . . . . . .  nothing.  That is the heart and soul of this "historic deal."   

The NY Times gives us this exerpted summary.  As you read, make note of the implicit criticism embedded in this excerpt and in the larger article:    

But it . . . . . .  reflects a broader scaling-back of the use of American muscle, not least in the Middle East, as well as a willingness to deal with foreign governments as they are rather than to push for new leaders that better embody American values. “Regime change,” in Iran or even Syria, is out; cutting deals with former adversaries is in.

 For Mr. Obama, the shift to diplomacy fulfills a campaign pledge from 2008 that he would stretch out a hand to America’s enemies and speak to any foreign leader without preconditions. But it will also subject him to considerable political risks, as the protests about the Iran deal from Capitol Hill and allies in the Middle East attest.

 “We’re testing diplomacy; we’re not resorting immediately to military conflict,” Mr. Obama said, defending the Iran deal on Monday in San Francisco. “Tough talk and bluster may be the easy thing to do politically,” he said earlier that day, “but it’s not the right thing for our security.”  You will want to read the larger article here,  at the NY Times. 

Editor's notes:  As an aside,  I think it noteworthy that the Times writer never refers to Obama as “President Obama,”  only “Mr. Obama.” 

Understand that the “scaling back  . . . .  of American muscle” is tantamount to the use of the American presidency to destroy American’s once imposing influence in this wicked world.  

“Peace from power” is a long held principle Hussein Obama has rejected,  in spite of the fact that this is his operating M.O. as to domestic policy.  Here,  at home,  he functions as a biased and narrow minded Chicago thug,  but in the outside world,  and especially the Muslim world,  he is hell bent on following a path of creating trust as he precedes with a diplomatic “policy” of  unilateral concessions to the exclusion of all who have reason to oppose his imperialist and Utopian decisions. 

Understand that he has been secretly working on this deal for nearly a year,  proving his claim that “all option are on the table" to have been a lie with regard to Syria and his feigned concern about the “red line” and the use of poisoned gases and the massacre of 160,000 Syrian citizens by forces populated,  in part,  by Iran. 

 He is so far out of step with many of his Democrat allies on this deal,  that he may have lost any influence he may have had left within his Progressive/Socialist collective.  Look for a publicly viewed backlash in the coming days from members of his own party.   

After secret negotiation for nearly year,  we find ourselves asking,  “Why now?”  and the answer is clear: To get ObamaCare off the front page.   

Apparently,  he does not understand the extent of the ObamaCare failing.  Because of his several postponements and the systemic nature of this legislative debachle,  he has guaranteed that his legacy legislation,  an appropriate failure,  will be a hot-blooded campaign issue for both 2014 and 2016.  This treaty,  with no diplomatic or military muscle written into its text,  will be another failure in the resume of this Presidential Boob and will serve as another anecdotal reminder of his pronounced ineptitude as a national and world leader. 

While good news for those who thirst for more ammunition to fire at this Professional Novice,  it casts serious doubt on the future of Israel and its ability to survive in a world bent on its total annihilation.  Suffice it to say,  this will be the news in the short term.  

The fear,  on the Left,  is that this deal might open the door to war in the Middle East,  an potential eventuality that will be laid at the feet of this presidential blowhard.  All we can do is hope for the best,  on that score.