<<<< Greta, O'Reilly, Kelly and Hannity are #1 for a reason
Editor's notes: Understand that in an off year election cycle in which the presidency is not being decided, lower viewer numbers are to be expected.
Couple what is "expected" with a disturbing one track news cycle, and you have a situation in which Americans are simply not interested in the "news" of the day. When I write "one track news cycle," I refer to the absence of anything news worthy other than the single but comprehensive Administration strategy of deceit that has been the case, exclusively, since the 2012 November elections.
Further, when CNN and MSNBC fail to cover stories detrimental to the advancement of progressive/socialist policy, the viewership tends to either turn off the "tube," or switch to Fox for that news. Understand that while Fox might be airing a segment on the truth concerning Benghazi or the documented and admitted lies told with regard to ObamaCare, CNN runs stories on how to prepare a fat free evening meal and MSNBC is talking about pooping down Sarah Palin's throat.
What would you do with such choices? The answer is clear, and the libs are paying the price for such nonsense. The one good thing about this circumstance is this: reduced viewership means a sharply reduced ability to pollute the news with distortions and misinformation; I mean, no one is watching so where has "their" influence gone?
______________________
Information details taken from: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/11/27/cnn-and-msnbc-lose-almost-half-their-viewers-one-year#ixzz2lw7He5xl
Information details taken from: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/11/27/cnn-and-msnbc-lose-almost-half-their-viewers-one-year#ixzz2lw7He5xl
No comments:
Post a Comment