Excerpts
from an impressive and comprehensive Washington Post article (7 pages), tells us the sad story of waste and a growing
ineptness within the counter terrorism community, all because of an anti-terror economy
that is out of control, secretive beyond belief, and in opposition to many of America’s values. It is a long article. I am not a fan of
the WaPost, but, this investigation is very impressive, a must read for those who really care about what
is going on in this country. In short, ineptness abounds with help from Obama’s
feckless administration.
*******
The
top-secret world the government created in response to the terrorist attacks of
Sept. 11, 2001, has become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one
knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs
exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work . . . . . . .
These are
not academic issues; lack of focus, not lack of resources, was at the heart of
the Fort Hood shooting that left 13 dead, as well
as the Christmas Day bomb attempt thwarted not by the thousands of analysts
employed to find lone terrorists but by an alert airline passenger who saw
smoke coming from his seatmate . . . . .
Underscoring
the seriousness of these issues are the conclusions of retired Army Lt. Gen.
John R. Vines, who was asked last year to review the method for tracking the
Defense Department's most sensitive programs. Vines, who once commanded 145,000
troops in Iraq
and is familiar with complex problems, was stunned by what he discovered.
"I'm
not aware of any agency with the authority, responsibility or a process in
place to coordinate all these interagency and commercial activities," he
said in an interview. "The complexity of this system defies
description." The result, he
added, is that it's impossible to tell whether the country is safer because of
all this spending and all these activities. "Because it lacks a
synchronizing process, it inevitably results in message dissonance, reduced
effectiveness and waste," Vines said. "We consequently can't
effectively assess whether it is making us more safe." Read the full article, here.
No comments:
Post a Comment