Midknight Review -- new and revised: The Sequestion: "dumb and arbitrary." Ok, but he is the author of this bill, plain and simple.

Washington Post:

Stymied by a GOP House, Obama looks ahead to 2014 to cement his legacy President Barack Obama warned Friday that the pain of the sequester “will be real.” He called the steep budget cuts “dumb” and “arbitrary” in a news conference following a meeting with Congressional leaders . . . .

Editor’s notes: understand that there is a big difference between a strong arm negotiator and one who understands the value of diplomacy. B Obama is willfully ignorant of the latter, having spent his entire adult life threatening his opposition and moving them into positions from which they must scream, “We surrender.” Whether this entity is a housing authority, a lending institution, a local government or a political faction, “negotiation” from an Obama perspective, is all about winning and losing. Understand that when he speaks of a legislative act that is “bi-partisan,” he really is talking a proposal that is solely his creation, one in which he has searched out and added a few of the opposition’s talking points. Since he has met with the opposition less than a half dozen times in four plus years, “bi-partisan” is only whatever he says it is. Since he refuses to accept anything other than sheer brokenness on the part of the opposition, his plan is to frame the debate in his self-serving terms, and hope that his plan wins back the House.

You don’t thumb your nose at the opposition and expect to lure them to the conference table; in fact, it is certain that he knows this to be true. He just does not care. White people who reverence the Constitution and our accept history, are his enemy. Success in 2014 is his target, and the national polemic is (will be) proof of what I am saying.

Sadly, as a community organizer, Obama has proven to be little more than an angry black troublemaker . . . . . with no end in sight, even after he “retires.”

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."

2 comments:

AnonymousMarch 3, 2013 at 7:34 PM
You might be a Republican if you politicized Benghazi for months then minimized the sequester that cut $79 million from the Embassy security budget.

moron hypocrites
John SmithsonMarch 3, 2013 at 11:41 PM
You neither care about Benghazi nor do you understand that the "cuts to the embassy security budget do not begin until April and are divided over a period of 5 years, in which time that that budget item will actually net a real increase. You really do not get "services baseline budgeting," do you?