Some in the Established Media refuse to "carry the water" for Obama as he tries to explain why his Administration did nothing to protect Ambassador Steven's in the days before the consulate attack.

As Obama and his Administration hide behind a FBI investigation, underway in Libya,  their claims of having no advance warnings are being drowned out with contradictions to that story.  There is a growing crescendo  working against the Administrations tall tales,  as well as questions from those believing the White House spinmeisters.    Persistent questions are increasing  as to why there was no “actionable intelligence”  when the viewing public could see the mounting dangers and the Libyan Government knew of the existential threat  to our diplomats,  beforehand.  

Add to this,  the major press in Europe,  in taking this position:  The west must be honest about its role in Libya's violent chaos.   The ambassador's death is a symptom of a wilting Arab spring for which the US and its allies bear much responsibility  (Guardian.co.uk). 

And now, none other than CBS News DC gives this supportive report:

As the liberal American press and ultra-liberal bloggers inundate the Internet and newsprints with criticisms of what Mitt Romney, the GOP presidential challenger to President Barack Obama, said about Obama during the Libyan attacks and murders, throngs of foreign press and few American outlets tell the real story involved with the White House’s role in the incidents that we now know could have been prevented.

After the American media grabbed and held the pro-Obama headlines against Romney’s comments and took Obama’s “Romney shoots first and aims second” quote to iconic proportions, the rest of the world is reporting that the Obama administration knew about the planned-attack on the Benghazi, Libya Embassy where four Americans, including United States Ambassador Christopher Steven was murdered.

That strong allegation needs to be “the story”, not the political-trouncing of Mitt Romney, a man who has nothing to do with the White House, the U.S. Embassy, or the deadly and non-deadly attacks on our United States Embassy’s around the world. “The story” obviously involves the White House and the president within – Barack Obama – not the Massachusetts challenger.

The reporters and bloggers who have made Mitt Romney the story – instead of the attacked-United States Embassy, the innocent Americans who were attacked, and the White House with its president in abstention as he continually treks the campaign trail regardless of the duties left behind in Washington, D.C. – are guilty of letting another American tragedy remain buried.

All attention must be given to the more-than-strong suggestions that the Libyan attack didn’t “just happen” to have happened on September 11 – the commemorative day of the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York City – but were planned well-in-advance.

While the movie trailer of “Innocence of Muslims” may have added fuel to the venom’s fire regarding the protests throughout the Middle East, the murderous attack on the U.S. Embassy and its American occupants in Benghazi, Libya was no accident – simply orchestrated by a few who had no plan or memory of 9/11.

Point of post:  Obama's house of cards is falling apart.  His claims for economic success were never going to be acceptable.  His claims to a responsible Middle Eastern policy are falling apart,  not only unsupported by the facts,  but challenged by a growing chorus of unbelievers.