<<<< 26% of the population supports the remaining three fourths of the population. Maybe "doing your fair share" should mean getting off your lazy butt and supporting yourself. For certain, we "rich" folks are already doing our fair share.
When we think of wealth
transfer, this chart proves that "wealth transfer" via
taxation is a full-throated fact. Half of the population accounts for only
3% of all income taxes. When we expand that population to 74% of all
working age adults, we find that this group, again 3/4 of the total
adult population, pays only 13% of all taxes.
When 76% of the population is supported by 24% of
the labor force, wealth
distribution is a already a reality. No more
talk of wealth distribution and doing our fair share. That has been the case for years. Now,
it is time for spending cuts that actually effective base-line budgeting,
if we ever get back to budgeted spending., that is. The Social Democrat Party no longer believes in
budgets and has not worked on a budget in three years. Understand that,
under the Obama Administration, this country's business
obligations have been "governed" by a series of "continuing
resolutions" (18 in three
years). If you realize that a "continuing
resolution" CONTINIUES the
spending patterns of the previous approved budget, you will understand that spending cuts effecting a budgeted
baseline, are not possible in a continuing resolution; properly
speaking, "spending cuts" are part of a prepared budget.
And, so, the Democrats, under Obama,
have "pulled a fast one" on the American people. Since
the Social Democrats no longer believe that "unsustainable"
spending is even possible ("all government spending is
stimulus" Obama, spring of 2009), operating without a budget is a
perfect way of running the national government.
Conclusion: please do not forward me another
article that posits the intelligence of the Left over and above conservatives.
Their theory of national finance is proof that "intelligence"
has nothing to do with the thinking of the idealistic Left, nothing.
They top should pay more. WHy?
ReplyDelete66% of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.
In 1950, the ratio of the average executive’s paycheck to the average worker’s paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.
The bottom 50 percent of income earners in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation’s wealth.
The top 1% of U.S. households own nearly twice as much of America’s corporate wealth as they did just 15 years ago.
Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.
61 percent of Americans “always or usually” live paycheck to paycheck, up from 43 percent in 2007.
Approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 – the highest rate in 20 years
43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement