There is a slow recovery going on. Here is why it's fact does not help Obama.

You are looking at a charted visual of the "summer of recovery."  More to the point,  you are looking at the pictorial explanation as to why the Administration is not scoring important electoral points for the recovery.  

Understand that the recovery has taken up a longer period of time than the recession, itself,  At the current rate of recovery,  we are looking at a minimum of 20 years before we get anywhere close to a full jobs recovery. At that rate,  most people will not see Obama's scheming as contributing to the recovery.   You should know that 6% employment marks the beginning of a robust economy,  We are looking at a minimum  7.5 %  unemployment rate throughout 2012 and into 2013.  With all the brag about jobs created,  as if Obama had anything to do with private sector job growth,  he remains 4 million jobs short of where we were before the recession.  In fact,  there are 2 million job positions that have simply disappeared from the fact of the labor scene.  They are no longer available.  Businesses have learned to run operations more efficiently and the implementation of the repressive Dodd/Frank regulatory bill will insure that the lessons of "lean operations" continue.  The accumulative damage done to the economy via Obama's idiot regulation is far worse in effect than the benefit he is seeking with Dodd/Frank.  

But don't tell the Administration.  They are still working on the idea of forced auto maintenance, nationwide.  You remember that it was B Obama who figured out that if we just aired up our tires and tuned our engines, we could walk away from Middle Eastern oil.  Genius !!!  In the meanwhile,  we will be paying through the nose.  

Please note:  Obama Democrats love repeating the lie that Obama has already created more jobs in three years than Bush did in 8 years.  B.S. and I am talking about chunky-style barnyard.  Under Bush,  the economy experienced 52 consecutive months of increased GDP . . . . the longest growth streak in American history and that includes the great economy under Bill Clinton.  You cannot have increasing GDP values without corresponding job growth.  It is impossible.  You - also - cannot maintain a 4.5% unemployment rate for 7 years (per GW's track record) without creating enough jobs to keep up with population growth.  I figure that Bush had to have created between 12 and 16 million jobs.  There are labor reports that show Bush creating just 3 million jobs,  but those numbers cannot include the considerations listed above.