But, you might
know this. What is not so obvious is the attached meaning to the New Hampshire vote
count. A low count of 250,000 will be taken to mean (by the Marxist
Media) that enthusiasm for the ouster of Obama is not as high as so many claim.
A vote count of 325,000 in a state whose population is one million,
will be seen in the opposite light.
I would add this
caveat to a "low turn out" scenario -- it may have
more to do with how folks in New Hampshire view the primary itself, than anything
else. If they see Romney's huge lead going into the vote as
insurmountable, today, that might chase some away from voting. If
folks are not, yet, settled, on who they prefer as a GOP nominee, the
turn-out might be, likewise, affected.
Understand this,
there is no substitute for the one "poll" that matters most,
the general election in November of this year. Remember
the mid-term elections of 2010? Some polls showed the Democrats
maintaining control of the House. In the end, those predictions
were laughable.
I see a record turnout for the "big dance" 10 months from now.
No comments:
Post a Comment