An article by a one world liberal international reporter, Toby Harnden, carries these remarks about a supposed Hillary Clinton presidency of the World Bank.
"If she served out a five-year term, that would take her beyond the 2016 election, when she would be 69. On the other hand, if she stepped down early from the World Bank she could enter the 2016 race for the White House with historically unparalleled experience in foreign policy, economic policy, on Capitol Hill and as First Lady. " Link
Here is my problem with this clown's assessment of Hillary: before Bill became president (and he really was not that bad of a president, on the occasion that his pants were not dragging the floor, if you know what I mean), Hillary was a practicing lawyer without a noteworthy caseload. After Bill's ascension to the presidency, she, of course, was one of the more active First Ladies in modern times, attempting but failing to institute her version of a national healthcare bill. The difference between her healthcare revision and Obama's is found in the fact that she actually assisted in writing the bill. More than than that, the bill was not a payout to unions and other special interest groups as is much of the current ObamaCare bill. As a sitting senator from New York, she served her time but without distinction (seriously, can you tell us how she set herself apart from the Democrat herd, while Senator?). Finally, as Secretary of State, she was tied to the thoughtlessness of the Obama administration and was unable to distinguish herself in this stately function, as well. My point in all this negativity is this: Hillary is hardly the qualified giant Mr. Harnden imagines.
I have read her BA thesis and compared it to the writings of Barack and Michelle Obama. By comparison, her writing is head and shoulders above that of either Obama. She actually writes quite well, on a graduate level, in fact. Barack and Michelle do not.
Make no mistake, however; Hillary is every bit the radical as Barack. While in college, she served as an intern for Saul Alinsky and her BA thesis was about this classic radical, the author of Rules for Radicals, a book still in print after more than 30 years, a radical whose ideas are used by the current regime. While Obama knows of this radical, Hillary actually worked under his tutelage and was befriended by Alinsky. More than this, she is much more the student of the man. In the near future, I intend to publish an article detailing Alinsky's advice and Obama's bumbling of that advice. Suffice it to say, as a radical reformer, Hillary would have never made the mistakes Obama has.
No comments:
Post a Comment