"I said, 'You want to repeal health care? Go at it. We'll have that debate. You're not going to be able to do that by nickel-and-diming me in the budget. You think we're stupid?'"
With reference to the GOP's push against Planned Parenthood, he claims to have told Speaker Boehner, "Put it in a separate bill. We'll call it up. And if you think you can overturn my veto, try it. But don't try to sneak this through."
Later in this clandestined discussion, this clown who claims to be the President of the UNITED States of America, had this to say, "When Paul Ryan says his priority is to make sure, he's just being America's accountant . . . . This is the same guy that voted for two wars that were unpaid for, voted for the Bush tax cuts that were unpaid for, voted for the prescription drug bill that cost as much as my health care bill--but wasn't paid for."Understand that this know-nothing president supported the notion that we "pass the healthcare bill so that we could find out what is in it" but complains about the Republicans "sneaking" in their agenda !!
And let's clear up one thing: there is the claim everywhere on the web that the 38.5 billion dollar cut forged by the GOP and signed into law by Obama is actually 358 million dollars in actual cuts. Yesterday, we had more than 450 readers come to this blog looking for information having to do with the current budget battle and, by rite of extension, the 2012 presidential campaign.
The readership needs to understand that the Marxist media will do whatever it has to do push Obama into his next term They know that if he loses the 2012 election and the GOP takes back the Senate, the legislative and regulatory advances for One World and Marxist redistributive causes will be reversed. They simply cannot lose the 2012 election. As a result of this reality, everything written by these Leftist supporters will go to the purpose of misinforming the population.
"They" want you to believe that the GOP and John Boehner accomplished next to nothing in the "so-called 38.5 billion dollar Continuing Resolution" in question. OK. I have not confirmed anything for myself, but let's go with a 356 million dollar cut in progressive legislative programs. What about the 38.2 billion dollars claimed by the GOP?? Are "they" saying that the GOP just made up that number hoping against hope that no one would discover what they have done? Talk about stupid !!!
First, the 356 million will result in as much as $500 million in program cuts from this current budget over the next 10 years. Secondly and, apparently, the bulk of this savings deal is the confiscation of funds that are "left overs" from other programs including TARP and unused funds in the Stimulus bill. These two programs, alone, have accounted for trillions of dollars transferred from one financial source to another. In the case of TARP, the last accounting I read was for 24 trillion. Apparently none of this is illegal, but, rather than being used for its intended purpose, TARP morphed into a slush fund of gargantuan proportions. Don't believe me? Try googling "TARP and 24 trillion " and see what you get.
The GOP secured the future for voucher programs; something that Obama had opposed. They took one billion out of EPA funding.
Point of post: I am going to continue to trust Boehner and the GOP leadership in both houses of congress. I am willing to give this GOP leadership until the next election to get things turned around. Heck, we all know that there are billions of dollars of special deals and special interest programs that have been hidden from plain sight. Our leaders need time to learn of these programs and begin to install their repairs.
Never forget this axiomatic truth: when the Marxist media gives you a story that effects how you feel about the conservative movement or the TEA Party or the individual players in the movement, that "information" is exactly what they want you to believe. If their lips are moving or their pins are bleeding ink, they are either lying or they are manipulating the truth to serve their purposes.
If you disagree with the statement, thinking it is far too general, you have not acquainted yourself with the strategies of the socialist reformers. In the book, Rules for Radicals, there is an entire chapter dedicated to the principle of "means and ends;" 23 pages under the title, "Ends and means" in which the author justifies the use of "particular means" to "accomplish particular ends." Saul Alinsky is the author and this 1971 book is still in print !! Why? Because the radical agenda continues to need direction and a well stated strategy. Hillary served as an intern under this well educated idiot and wrote her senior thesis on the life of Saul Alinsky. He died in 1978 as I remember.
Next week, we will be reviewing chapter two of Alinsky's book and his convoluted effort at justifying the anecdotal use of means to accomplish whatever "particular purpose" he and his kind deems as moral. Situation Ethics was a very popular book and concept at the time of Alinsky. His book is the political strategy borne of a dynamic and situational ethic based upon the whims of the Marxist do-gooders.
m
No comments:
Post a Comment