Obama is not campaigning. Oh, really? Anyone seen his schedule, lately.

We were told, last week, when Obama announced the beginning of his 2012 campaign, that he would not be involved in the campaign for months because "he has a job to do."

Really?

Like all - as in "every single" - his promises, this statement is not even close to being true. He has made campaign speeches every day since the announcement. Here is Obama's schedule for the two days. Note that we are giving you his itinerary for two of the week's "work days." While Clinton was busy "dropping drawer" during the work week, Obama is playing games (basketball and golf) and campaigning.

4/20

9:40 am || Delivers remarks at DNC fundraiser; St. Regis Hotel, San Francisco
10:35 am || Departs San Francisco
11:30 am || Arrives Reno, Nev.
11:50 am || Town Hall meeting on the deficit; ElectraTherm, Inc.
1:30 pm || Departs Reno
2:45 pm || Arrives Los Angeles
5:30 pm || Delivers remarks at fundraiser #1; The Commissary at Sony Picture Studios
6:55 pm || Delivers remarks at fundraiser #2; Soundstage 30 at Sony Picture Studios
6:55 pm || Delivers remarks at fundraiser #3; Tavern Restaurant

4/21
  • 9:40 a.m. Obama delivers remarks at a DNC event
  • 10:35 a.m. Obama departs San Francisco, Calif.
  • 11:30 a.m. Obama arrives in Reno, Nev.
  • 11:50 a.m. Obama participates in a Shared Responsibility and Shared Prosperity town hall where he will discuss his vision for bringing down our deficit
  • 1:30 p.m. Obama departs Reno, Nev.
  • 2:45 p.m. Obama arrives in Los Angeles, Calif.
  • 5:30 p.m. Obama delivers remarks at a DNC event
  • 6:55 p.m. Obama delivers remarks at a DNC event
  • 7:50 p.m. Obama delivers remarks at a DNC event
He is campaigning and his schedule proves the point.

You should know that "DNC" is short for Democrat National Convention. And why is he campaigning a full year and half before the 2012 elections, the earliest official beginning in modern history ? And the final answer is . . . . . . . . . . . . . he is so far behind in the numbers game that he may never get his big-eared head above water before November of 2012.

Forget the "polls." Most of them will are run by partisan Democrat socialist and are not dependable for that very reason. We have run articles in which we analyze the actual numbers the percentages purport to resent.

I have posited two numerical estimates. One, on the high end of the guessing game, gives the conservative opponent 73 million votes and the losing Marxist/Socialist Democrat, 58 million votes.

A second estimate looks like this: 60 million folks voted against Obama in 2008. Every one of these people will vote and vote against the Stranger in our White House. He garnered 69 million votes, by the way. Keep our baseline numbers in mind ( 60 and 69). Understand that Obama in down in every demographic on the books: down 30 points among "academics," down 56 points among Hispanics, down 5 points among Blacks, down "double digits" with women, white males, and, down from 52% to 35% with Independents. If he improves within most of these national demographics but still gives up 5% in swing votes, the baseline changes to this extent: Obama 64.5 million votes to the GOP candidate's 64.5 million votes.

If you believe, as I do, that somewhere between 3 and 5 million conservatives did not vote at all, in protest to the Establishment GOP and its henchman, John McCain, the final popular vote count would be Obama, 64.5 million votes to the good guys total of 67.5 to nearly 70 million votes. This is my version of "best case scenario." O

Never, ever forget that Obama spent three quarters of a billion dollars to win an election by 7%. And that was before he had a visible reputation. If that does not cause concern in the Democrat ranks, it is because they have never sobered up from the 1960's. Understand that they will not be able to duplicate the good feelings of the electorate to the levels of the 2008. Those days are gone and, so too, is his chance of winning re-election. At least, that is my theory.

No comments:

Post a Comment