Midknight Review -- new and revised: Obama seeks the power to kill without legal review. He wants to hide behind "state secrets." See what his friends have to say. It ain't nice.

From Salon, 9/25/10: At this point, I didn't believe it was possible, but the Obama administration has just reached an all-new low in its abysmal civil liberties record. In response to the lawsuit filed by Anwar Awlaki's father asking a court to enjoin the President from assassinating his son, a U.S. citizen, without any due process, the administration last late night, according to The Washington Post, filed a brief asking the court to dismiss the lawsuit without hearing the merits of the claims. That's not surprising: both the Bush and Obama administrations have repeatedly insisted that their secret conduct is legal but nonetheless urge courts not to even rule on its legality. But what's most notable here is that one of the arguments the Obama DOJ raises to demand dismissal of this lawsuit is "state secrets": in other words, not only does the President have the right to sentence Americans to death with no due process or charges of any kind, but his decisions as to who will be killed and why he wants them dead are "state secrets," and thus no court may adjudicate its legality. . . . . READ MORE >>>

Editor's notes: understand that Anwar Awlaki is both an American citizen and a terrorist. Rather than work for his arrest, Obama has decided to make a public declaration that he, Obama, wants Awlake dead. Obama didn' t have to tell anyone in the public arena. Bush did mush the same thing with enemies of the state, but he didn't announce his plans to the world. Obama, on the other hand, has gone one up on Bush, ahhhhh, make that "two up." First, he invited the world's approval in making his announcement and, secondly, he invoked "state secrets" in making his decision. If upheld by a court of law, this would give Obama absolute secrecy in deciding who lives and dies, and why.

Question: what is worse than being dumb and stupid? Answer: Being dumb, stupid and dangerous.

Look, do we allow our police officers to make back room decisions on who lives and who dies? For any reason? Even if the suspect is a mass murderer? This is exactly what Obama has done and even worse, he has asked that his decisions remain without review.

Finally, note that the above editorial comes from Salon. This blog is run by the hard Left. The article is not a news clip but an opinion piece by Obama's friends on the far Left. Even they see this as the danger it is.

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."

Midknight Review -- new and revised

Obama seeks the power to kill without legal review. He wants to hide behind "state secrets." See what his friends have to say. It ain't nice.

No comments:

Post a Comment

copyright policy of the original Midknight Review