Midknight Review asks: Is Obama the man in charge of a concerted effort at transforming this country into a One World Player. Something IS wrong !!

Even before we throw in the Pepsi logo ( a huge contributor to the Obama campaign), one sees a rather alarming confluence of purpose in the three trademarks pictured in this post. The new logo for the Missile Defense Agency, which is part of the Defense Department, is on the left; ACORN's tie to Obama is clearly seen in their newly designed logo (minus the "Obamacorn" wording, of course ) and the official Obama logo on the right, when added to the first two trademarks, presents a picture that is of concern to this editor.

Our question is this: is the inlaying color scheme in many of the various trademarks and logo's coming onto the scene just an indication of a populace preference or is there more to what we see?

Midknight Review thinks the latter and here is why. Obama's talk of "fundamentally transforming the United States of America" is the single most unusual threat made by any elected Washington leader in modern times. Add to this, Obama's push for a civilian army (go to Organization for America to see what is happening in this regard) birthed from this quote taken from a July 2, 2008 speech:

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." (video of the speech is here and, as memory serves this editor, is located around the 16 minute mark). Read that comment a few times and come up with an innocuous meaning that is not "conspiratorial" to some degree ---- go ahead and make the effort.

Add to the above, Midknight Review's article documenting Obama's confiscation of 100 million tax dollars for the purpose of funding his youth army (read this article) and Michelle Obama's statement:

"Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation,"

and what do we have if not a very deliberate threat to Traditional America. Obama's ascension to power more than a year go, is nothing short of a soft coup and he is more the ideologue in this effort than many people suppose ---- jds.
.
.