Remember these two Supreme Court decisions:
Hasanna/Tabor Lutheran Church v EEOC (decision on Jan 23, 2012)
Sackett v the EPA (decision on February 26, 2012)
The first case resulted from an effort on the part of the Obama Administration to force religious institutions to hire from the available workforce without discrimination. In other words, if a church, to hire an unbeliever or a member of a disagreeable fellowship (and some of you believe he is not at war with the Christian church).
The second was a lawsuit resulting from the idiot notion that the EPA was above the law. In this case, the EPA had ordered a family named Sackett, to vacate their property because it [the EPA] had decided the property was a wetlands. The EPA had refused a lower court's decision to quit its complaint against the Sacketts. The regulatory agency refused to comply and three years later, all parties concerned were standing before the High court.
The long and short of this post is the following fact: both these Obama driven, pro-government, anti freedom of the people circumstances were defeated by the Supreme Court by 9 - 0 decisions, including the votes of Justices Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in both cases.
One would have expect these two Obama appointees to have voted in line with Obama's corrupt agenda. I actually believe that Sotomayor is not quite as liberal as Kagan. Whatever the case, we really do not know how the ObamaCare decision will go, in spite of the fact that the anti-ObamaCare plantiffs seemed to have had a good day in court.
Update: this note from MRC-TV saw Sotomayor as being somewhat critical of the health care law:
Justice Sotomayor, and Obama appointee, appeared skeptical of solicitor general Verrilli's claims [he defended the government's case - blog editor] that the individual mandate is not based upon the idea that the government can force people into commerce and that there is no limit on its power to do so. The justice and solicitor general were very much at odds on this point.