The world versus the US Constitution and American gun rights.

Here is the second amendment - a whole single sentence long:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." There two considerations in this amendment.

1. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, shall not be infringed.

2. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

One cannot read this any other way without destroying the meaning of the amendment. Understand that if "militia" is the only intent of the Founding Fathers in this amendment, there is no reason for the writing of ". . . the right of the people to keep and bear Arms." It would be good enough to write, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, shall not be infringed." But there is more than a corporate consideration in this amendment -- there is the individual. If the individual cannot keep and bear arms, there is no basis for a militia. Both have to be protected.

As we move to a world economy, both economic and political, the threat tp individual gun ownership is increased and that is the point of the following video.



The threat to our individual gun rights is being challenged everywhere in the world and profoundly so. In more than 200 years of American history, the government has had no need to fear an armed constituency - the Civil War not withstanding.

There can be only one reason for the theft of our gun rights ------- dominance and tyranny.
.
.