Understand that the Pats beat the Colts badly, and more because of special teams, a scary defense, and the Pats running game, than the passing game.
The score, you ask? 45 to 7.
Editor's notes: "No direct evidence" may translate into a full "pardon" for Brady. It was an idiotic NFL decision, anyway. The practice for which Brady was accused, is fairly common. To think that this nonsense should cost Brady millions of dollars in lost salary is more than bizarre.
The score, you ask? 45 to 7.
Editor's notes: "No direct evidence" may translate into a full "pardon" for Brady. It was an idiotic NFL decision, anyway. The practice for which Brady was accused, is fairly common. To think that this nonsense should cost Brady millions of dollars in lost salary is more than bizarre.
NEW YORK (AP) - A federal judge put the NFL on the defensive Wednesday over its four-game suspension of Tom Brady, demanding to know what evidence directly links the New England quarterback to deflated footballs and belittling the drama of the controversy. "What is the direct evidence that implicates Mr. Brady?" Judge Richard M. Berman repeatedly asked NFL lawyer Daniel L. Nash at the first hearing in the civil case in Manhattan federal court as Brady and Commissioner Roger Goodell looked on.

No comments:
Post a Comment