Mission Statement: This blog reviews the news of the day in light of 242 years of American history. "Nationalism," a modern day pejorative, has been our country's politic throughout history, until 2008. Obama changed that narrative. Trump is seeking a return to our historical roots. Midknight Review supports this return to normality.
The degree of subversive activity on the part of Hillary may indicate that she is be covering over something even more serious than classified documants.
Editor's notes: As you and do your best to understand exactly what is the problem regarding Hillary and the emails stored on her server, keep this in mind: The server belonged to her, personally. It is irrelevant as to whether she sent out classified email. The fact of the matter is that all emails, regardless of classification, were stored on a private server in her home. Does anyone actually believe that the Sec. of State would not receive a single classified document in 4 years of service? Good grief. This is not complicated, folks. Secondly, Hillary was one of only 20 Obama approved personnel given charge to classify documents. I am saying, she HAD to know what was classified because she was one of a few who had the authority and training to do just that, classify emails and other documents. In her March statement, she said, "I certainly know what a classified document is." Indeed, she does and that adds to the problem. Finally, before the server was turned over to the FBI on Wednesday, all the information on that server had been transferred to another sever back in 2013 . . . . . . and Hillary knew this to be the case, after all, it is her server(s).
What if Hillary is hiding something else, far more damaging to her career than illegally stored "top secret" documents ??
WASHINGTON (AP) — The two emails on Hillary Rodham Clinton's private server that an auditor deemed "top secret" include a discussion of a news article detailing a U.S. drone operation and a separate conversation that could point back to highly classified material in an improper manner or merely reflect information collected independently, U.S. officials who have reviewed the correspondence told The Associated Press.
The sourcing of the information could have significant political implications as the 2016 presidential campaign heats up. Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, agreed this week to turn over to the FBI the private server she used as secretary of state, and Republicans in Congress have seized on the involvement of federal law enforcement as a sign that she was either negligent with the nation's secrets or worse.
On Monday, the inspector general for the 17 spy agencies that make up what is known as the intelligence community told Congress that two of 40 emails in a random sample of the 30,000 emails Clinton gave the State Department for review contained information deemed "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," one of the government's highest levels of classification.
The two emails were marked classified after consultations with the CIA, which is where the material originated, officials said.
The officials who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity work in intelligence and other agencies. They wouldn't detail the contents of the emails because of ongoing questions about classification level. Clinton did not transmit the sensitive information herself, they said, and nothing in the emails she received makes clear reference to communications intercepts, confidential intelligence methods or any other form of sensitive sourcing . . . . . you will want to finish this article, here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment