Obama officially celebrates "indecision" as a precursor to effective leadership. Doubt me??? Read this:

From Roll Call:    President Barack Obama’s Syria strategy may not have been particularly decisive, but that’s not a bad thing, according to the White House.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney defended his boss Thursday after a blistering few weeks of criticism in Congress and elsewhere over his handling of the Syria crisis.

Carney said the American people “appreciate a president who doesn’t celebrate decisiveness for decisiveness’ sake.” He also said Americans like that Obama is open to “new information” and adjusts his course accordingly.

Carney said that in the end, the president will deserve credit if the diplomatic initiative with Russia to get Syria to give up its chemical weapons arsenal succeeds.

Question:  Will Obama,  then,  accept blame when it becomes obvious that he has been played,  that there will be no chemical deal,  that hundreds of thousands more Syrians will die,  that Islam will continue to target Christianity and work to annihilate Israel?  

Finally,  I have to make this very obvious point:  To admit "indecision" is to admit that the man has no plan  . . . . . .  surely there are Democrats,  out there,  who are not this ridiculous.