Update: I really cannot say enough about how well Mitt
Romney did in the CNN debate . . . . . . especially since I didn't say anything
about his effort in the original text. Romney not only appeared the most
presidential, he gave Newt a serious butt-kicking. As an example,
after Newt came up with another anti-capitalist argument ("You
[Mitt] invested in Goldman Sachs. How many Floridians have lost their
homes because of Goldman Sachs") -- an idiot's argument coming
from anyone, especially a supposed pro-growth Republican. He was actually criticizing Mitt for having invested in the stock market. Romney
responded by turning and reminding the Speaker that, he too, had investment capital in Sachs and other Wall Street entities to which Gingrich
had absolutely no response.
At another moment
in the debate, following Rick Santorum's scolding of Wolfe Blitzer for
asking petty questions, Wolfe asked Newt to defend a criticism of Romney
leveled by Gingrich on local television, during the week. Newt
decided to refuse to defend his accusation, appealing to Santorum's criticism
of Wolfe, just moments before. Newt raised his arms and something
along this line, "What say that we four move on from these trivial
questions and talk about substance." While Blitzer defended his
question in a brisk exchange with the speaker, Romney butted into the
Blitzer/Gingrich exchange by saying, "Wouldn't it be nice if we did
not say things about the others that needed defending here?" or
words to that effect.
I thought this
point was great. Gingrich was trying to create another South Carolina
moment, in which he jumped all over the major media host, and used
that moment to propel himself into a huge victory in that state's primary.
Romney was having nothing to do with that effort. And his timing
was perfect. Mitt injected himself into the conversation just before a
positive response from the audience and took the moment away from Newt.
Anyway, Mitt
Romney showed himself a superior debateman (word ??) and proved to me his
ability to more than hang with Obama. He appeared presidential, as
I said above, and, more than that, he was unflappable,
maintaining a calm, level headed demeanor in the face of Newt's baseless
assaults and Santorum's intense criticism, saying to Rick,
"You don't have to get angry about it," leaving Santorum
with no rebuttal.
On point,
Santorum had a great night, perhaps winning the night on substance but Romney was most impressive for all of the above and Newt was the night's Biggest Loser.
Original text:
Even with crowd noise, Newt was not able to pull off that
sense of the incredible that had been his in South Carolina. Two days
ago, he was up on Romney by 6 points. Going into the debate,
tonight, he was 8 points down and the debate did not help his cause.
While Santorum had
his best debate of the campaign, even better than the Monday night event,
he has so little money that he really has no chance except to win out at
a brokered convention but he will have enough delegates at the National Convention in the end of August, to be a major player.
Ron Paul is
in the race to gain ground for his cause and to strengthen the Libertarian
position and he is doing much better, this year, with that agenda
than in the last campaign. He will go to the National Convention with a
healthy collective of delegates and make his presence known there,
influencing the convention on matters important to him.
As things stand
tonight, Newt has 31 delegates and Romney has 32. After the Florida
primary, one of the two will have an addition 50 delegates. Florida is a
winner take all convention and "50" is the delegate count that is up
for grabs.
Here is what remains
between now and June 26.
February 4–11, 2012
|
Maine (caucus)
|
February 7, 2012
|
Colorado (caucus)
Minnesota (caucus) Missouri (primary) – *See note below on Missouri |
February 28, 2012
|
Arizona (primary)
Michigan (primary) |
March 3, 2012
|
Washington (caucus)
|
March 6, 2012
(Super Tuesday) |
Alaska (caucus)
Georgia (primary) Idaho (caucus) Massachusetts (primary) North Dakota (caucus) Ohio (primary) Oklahoma (primary) Tennessee (primary) Vermont (primary) Virginia (primary) |
March 6-10, 2012
|
Wyoming (caucus)
|
March 10, 2012
|
Kansas (caucus)
U.S. Virgin Islands (caucus) |
March 13, 2012
|
Alabama (primary)
Hawaii (caucus) Mississippi (primary) |
March 17, 2012
|
Missouri (GOP caucus) – *See note below on Missouri
|
March 18, 2012
|
Puerto Rico (primary)
|
March 20, 2012
|
Illinois (primary)
|
March 24, 2012
|
Louisiana (primary)
|
April 3, 2012
|
District of Columbia (primary)
Maryland (primary) Wisconsin (primary) Texas (primary) |
April 24, 2012
|
Connecticut (primary)
Delaware (primary) New York (primary) Pennsylvania (primary) Rhode Island (primary) |
May 8, 2012
|
Indiana (primary)
North Carolina (primary) West Virginia (primary) |
May 15, 2012
|
Nebraska (primary)
Oregon (primary) |
May 22, 2012
|
Arkansas (primary)
Kentucky (primary) |
June 5, 2012
|
California (primary)
Montana (primary) New Jersey (primary) New Mexico (primary) South Dakota (primary) |
June 26, 2012
|
Utah (primary)
|
It is to our
advantage to drag this process out. The moment the Obama slander
machine sees who the GOP candidate is, it will begin its process of lies,
lies and more lies. If we can put that off until well into the month of
March or the end of that month, we will
be able to go toe to toe with this bunch of Chicago based goons. There has been much talk of Obama spending a billion
dollars in this campaign. What people don't know, apparently,
is that he spent 3/4 of a billion last time plus another billion from
private money partners. Nothing will be new with this election in that regard.
But,
because of Citizens United
(Corporations are people too -- dang right !!!). the GOP will have
PAC money in large enough amounts (hundreds of millions of dollars) to offset
the Dark Side with its overseas accounts and hidden treasure.
No comments:
Post a Comment